Fig. 1
From: The behavioural phenotype of SATB2-associated syndrome: a within-group and cross-syndrome analysis
Bar graphs used to represent categorical data (a, b), histograms used to represent normally distributed continuous data based on the mean and SD (c), and boxplots used to represent non-normally distributed data based on the median and IQR (d). a Chi-square analyses comparing frequencies of self-injury, physical aggression, and property destruction (significant group differences at p < .01). b Chi-square analyses comparing frequencies of CBQ topographies of self-injury. c ANOVA analysis comparing CBQ self-injury severity scores between SAS, AS, and autism. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals; ± (1.96 × standard error of the mean). d Kruskal–Wallis analyses comparing TAQ subscale scores between SAS, AS, and autism (significant group differences at p < .01). *AS group level comparisons were not conducted for the impulsive speech subscale due to small number of verbal participants (n = 3). Group level comparison conducted for verbal participants only (SAS: n = 20, autism: n = 46)