Skip to main content

Table 4 Between-group differences in sample with DS and MA controls

From: Development and validation of the Arizona Cognitive Test Battery for Down syndrome

Measure

DS mean (SD) (N = 55)

MA control mean (SD) (N = 36)

t

p

Effect sizes d

Background and benchmark

 KBIT-II verbal score

26.40 (10.33)

27.39 (5.49)

−0.59

0.60

–

 KBIT-II non-verbal score

13.66 (4.51)

13.97 (3.44)

−0.36

0.72

–

 CANTAB Spatial Span span

2.58 (1.26)

2.88 (1.07)

−1.17

0.25

–

Hippocampal

 CANTAB first trials correct

8.87 (5.78)

13.44 (6.54)

−3.05

0.001

0.74

 Computer generated arena % time in the target quadrant

26.73 (19.83)

20.69 (21.19)

1.25

0.21

–

Prefrontal

 CANTAB ID/ED errors per stagea

5.02 (2.91)

3.86 (1.44)

2.60

0.009

0.51

 Modified dots task inhib. control phase percent correct

67.31 (32.46)

75.62 (21.30)

−1.37

0.18

0.30

 Modified dots task combined phase percent correct

57.28 (18.43)

66.55 (22.26)

−1.97

0.05

0.45

Cerebellar

 CANTAB simple RT median corr. latency (ms)

678.93 (314.46)

595.88 (142.69)

1.64

0.11

0.34

 NEPSY visuomotor precision total score

15.08 (5.34)

14.57 (4.69)

0.41

0.69

–

 Tabletop finger sequencing mean latency (all trials) (s)

44.97 (20.36)

33.92 (12.64)

2.62

0.01

0.65

  1. aAnalyzed with Mann-whitney U to account for the observed deviations in normality