Table 3 Reproducibility of KiTAP measures with analysis of range and distribution of scores in FXS cohort^a

Alertness (n = 29)

Correct

17

Too many with ceiling

Omissions

19

Anticipations

9

RT

Good

0.87

SD RT

Good

0.89

Distractibility (n = 26)

Correct

4

Omissions

1

Fair

0.56

Errors

4

Good

0.62

RT

Skewed

0.89 (0.95 without outlier)

Go-Nogo (n = 28)

Correct

7

Errors

6

Good

0.88

Omissions

7

Good

0.57

RT

Good

0.88

SD RT

Flexibility (n = 27)

Correct

0

Errors

1

Good

0.73

RT

Fair

0.78

SD RT

Vigilance (n = 18)

Correct

6 (trial 1);10 (trial 2)

Too much ceiling, strong learning effect

Omissions

6 (trial 1); 10 (trial 2)

Errors

5 (trial 1); 13 (trial 2)

RT

Good but had outliers

0.71 without outlier

Visual Scanning (n = 16)

Correct

0

Too few could do test to get distribution

Omissions

0

RT

SD RT

Sustained Attention (n = 8)

Correct

0

Too few could do test to get distribution

Omissions

0

Errors

0

Divided Attention (n = 5)

Correct

0

Too few could do test to get distribution

Omissions

1

Errors

1

RT