Figure 5

Spatial attentional resource allocation task (SARAT) design. (A) In each trial, a cue indicated that a target would appear in the cued location(s). Cues were valid in 80% of the trials and invalid in 20% of the trials. (B) Examples of each cue number. There were four cue conditions, in which 1, 2, 3, or all 4 locations were cued. (C) Examples of each target type. Targets were either low- or high-saliency.