Skip to main content

Table 3 Logistic regression analyses predicting sibling diagnosis

From: Attention and motor deficits index non-specific background liabilities that predict autism recurrence in siblings

 

Model 1

Model 2a

Model 2b

Model 3

Model 4

Model 5

 

n = 35

n = 35

n = 35

n = 35

n = 35

n = 35

 

OR

(95% CI)

p

OR

(95% CI)

p

OR

(95% CI)

p

OR

(95% CI)

p

OR

(95% CI)

p

OR

(95% CI)

p

Proband SRS-2 score (teacher report)

1.02

(0.97–1.08)

0.461

1.02

(0.95–1.08)

0.609

1.01

(0.95–1.09)

0.729

1.02

(0.94–1.09)

0.678

1.02

(0.94–1.09)

0.678

  

Sibling TRF ADHP score (teacher report)

  

1.15

(1.01–1.30)

0.033

  

1.09

(0.97–1.23)

0.144

1.09

(0.97–1.23)

0.159

1.09

(0.97–1.22)

0.155

Sibling DCDQ score (parent report)

    

0.91

(0.85–0.97)

0.003

0.92

(0.86–0.98)

0.010

0.92

(0.86–0.98)

0.013

0.92

(0.86–0.98)

0.009

TRF ADHP × DCDQ interaction

        

1.00

(0.98–1.01)

0.640

  

Nagelkerke R 2

0.022

0.283

0.464

0.531

0.537

0.527

  1. Note: n = 35 for all models (only siblings with all data available were included). For SRS-2 and TRF, a higher score indicates more severe impairment. For DCDQ, a higher score represents better functioning
  2. SRS-2 Social Responsiveness Scale-2 (T score), TRF ADHP DSM-oriented Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Problems Scale (T score), from Teacher Report Form, DCDQ Developmental Disorder Coordination Questionnaire (adjusted total score)