Skip to main content

Table 4 Hierarchical regression analysis summary for three dependent variables with Vineland covariate

From: Predicting progress in word learning for children with autism and minimal verbal skills

  R2 Δ R2 ΔF DF β SE
β
Prob
β
Part
DV—phonemic score/trial set 2
Model 1 .04 .04 .68 (1,17)     
  Vineland total SS      .20 .69 .422 .20
Model 2 .40 .36 9.62** (1,16)     
  Vineland total SS      −.01 .59 .968 −.01
  Week 4 words passed/trial      .64 .68 .007 .60
Model 3 .62 .22 8.92** (1,15)     
  Vineland total SS      −.09 .49 .622 −.08
  Week 4 words passed/trial      −.03 .93 .928 −.02
  Week 4 phonemic/trial      .84 .92 .009 .47
DV—words passed/trial set 2
Model 1 .07 .07 1.36 (1,17)     
  Vineland total SS      .27 .08 .260 .27
Model 2 .47 .40 11.94** (1,16)     
  Vineland total SS      .06 .07 .764 .06
  Week 4 words passed/trial      .66 .08 .003 .63
Model 3 .56 .09 3.02 (1,15)     
  Vineland Total SS      .01 .06 .956 .01
  Week 4 words passed/trial      .25 .12 .420 .14
  Week 4 phonemic/trial      .53 .12 103 .30
DV—words passed/week all subsequent weeks
Model 1 .10 .10 1.90 (1,17)     
  Vineland total SS      .32 .56 .186 .32
Model 2 .47 .37 11.08** (1,16)     
  Vineland total SS      .11 .47 .573 .11
  Week 4 words passed/trial      .64 .54 .004 .61
Model 2 .76 .30 18.73*** (1,15)     
  Vineland total SS      .02 .33 .867 .02
  Week 4 words passed/trial      −.12 .62 .601 −.07
  Week 4 phonemic/trial      .96 .62 .001 .54
  1. *** = < .001, ** = < .01, * = < .05, ^ = < .10