Skip to main content

Table 5 Caregiver satisfaction with intervention services

From: Utilization of telemedicine to support caregivers of young children with ASD and their Part C service providers: a comparison of intervention outcomes across three models of service delivery

 

Strongly agree (%)

Agree (%)

Disagree or strongly disagree (%)

IPa

TMa

Hyb.

IPa

TMa

Hyb.

IPa

TMa

Hyb.

The objectives of the consultation were clear.

83

82

87

17

19

13

0

0

0

Appointments and home visits were appropriate in length and scheduled at convenient times.

90

93

87

10

7

13

0

0

0

The consultant was knowledgeable about interventions.

90

96

87

10

0

13

0

4

0

The consultant was knowledgeable about child development and my child’s developmental challenges.

90

96

73

10

0

27

0

4

0

The consultant understood and addressed our needs.

90

89

87

10

7

13

0

4

0

The consultant was well prepared and well organized.

93

93

87

7

7

13

0

0

0

The consultant communicated clearly.

90

93

87

10

7

13

0

0

0

The consultant provided useful recommendations.

93

93

87

7

7

13

0

0

0

My child’s behavior and skills improved during this service.

77

78

60

23

19

40

0

4

0

The final report provided was understandable and useful.

87

78

80

10

22

20

0

0

0

I was pleased with the outcome of services for me and my child.

87

85

87

10

11

13

0

4

0

I would recommend these services to other families.

87

89

87

10

7

13

0

4

0

  1. aData available for 72 caregivers. N = 30 for in-person (IP) group; N = 22 for telemedicine-only (TM) group; N = 15 for hybrid group