Skip to main content

Table 2 Trials per condition. Mean number of trials and range, per condition, used in the ERP analysis, calculated for cognitively able autistic adults and neurotypical (NT) adults separately

From: Is the dolphin a fish? ERP evidence for the impact of typicality during early visual processing in ultra-rapid semantic categorization in autism spectrum disorder

Condition

NT adults (mean trials)

NT adults (range)

Autistic adults (mean trials)

Autistic adults (range)

Non- food, 82.3 ms presentation time

173.5

128–196

170.2

136–195

Non- food, 23.5 ms presentation time

169.2

120–192

162.8

131–191

Non- animal, 82.3 ms presentation time

174.4

143–197

168.9

122–195

Non- animal, 23.5 ms presentation time

171.7

128–197

164.1

126–196

Food, typical, 82.3 ms presentation time

89.3

67–102

87.1

65–109

Food, typical, 23.5 ms presentation time

89.6

57–113

82.4

53–99

Food, atypical, 82.3 ms presentation time

81.3

54–101

78.4

62–90

Food, atypical, 23.5 ms presentation time

70.2

49–90

68.4

33–91

Animal, typical, 82.3 ms presentation time

99.7

75–122

95.9

64–112

Animal, typical, 23.5 ms presentation time

98.8

82–114

95.6

66–116

Animal, atypical, 82.3 ms presentation time

76.3

63–86

73.4

47–89

Animal, atypical, 23.5 ms presentation time

74.4

56–92

71.9

52–83

  1. Note that non-food and no-animal conditions were only used for the dN150 analysis