Skip to main content

Table 4 Occurrence and quality of behavioural, psychological, cognitive and sleep characteristics reported in CHARGE syndrome

From: Phenotypic characteristics and variability in CHARGE syndrome: a PRISMA compliant systematic review and meta-analysis

 

Sample Identification

Confirmation of Syndrome

Assessment of Cognition

Assessment of Behaviour

Assessment of Sleep

Quality Weighting: Cognition

Quality weighting: Behaviour

Quality Weighting: Sleep

Abadie et al. [15]

4

2

2

NA

NA

67%

67%

NA

Asher et al. [41]

2

1

1

NA

NA

33%

NA

NA

Bernstein and Denno [42]

2

1

1

2

NA

33%

42%

NA

Blake and Brown [43]

2

2

1

NA

NA

42%

NA

NA

Blake et al. [44]

3

2

1

NA

NA

50%,

NA

NA

Blake et al. [19]

3

1

1

1

1

42%

42%

42%

Cheng et al. [45]

2

3

1

1

1

50%

50%

50%

Dammeyer [46]

2

1

3

NA

1

50%

NA

33%

Davenport et al. [47]

3

2

2

NA

NA

58%

NA

NA

Deuce et al. [48]

3

1

1

1

1

NA

42%

42%

Deuce [49]

2

1

1

NA

1

33%

NA

33%

Dobbelsteyn et al. [50]

3

1

1

NA

NA

42%

NA

NA

Hale et al. [8]

2

4

1

NA

NA

58%

NA

NA

Hartshorne et al. [51]

2

1

NA

NA

2

NA

NA

42%

Hartshorne et al. [18]

3

1

1

1

1

42%

42%

42%

Hartshorne and Cypher [52]

2

1

NA

1

NA

NA

33%

NA

Hartshorne et al. [53]

2

1

NA

2

NA

NA

42%

NA

Harvey et al. [54]

2

2

2

NA

NA

50%

42%

NA

Hittner et al. [55]

2

1

2

NA

NA

42%

NA

NA

Hsu et al. [56]

2

4

1

NA

NA

58%

NA

NA

Husu et al. [57]

3

3

1

NA

NA

58%

NA

NA

Issekutz et al. [1]

4

2

NA

1

1

NA

58%

58%

Johansson et al. [58]

2

2

2

3

1

50%

58%

42%

Jongmans et al. [10]

2

3

1

NA

NA

50%

NA

NA

Lasserre et al. [59]

2

2

3

NA

NA

58%

NA

NA

Legendre et al. [11]

3

3

1

NA

NA

58%

NA

NA

Oley et al. [60]

3

2

3

NA

NA

50%

NA

NA

Raqbi et al. [61]

2

2

1

NA

NA

42%

NA

NA

Reda and Hartshorne [62]

2

1

NA

2

NA

NA

42%

NA

Roger et al. [63]

3

2

1

NA

4

50%

NA

75%

Salem-Hartshorne and Jacob [64]

2

1

2

NA

NA

42%

NA

NA

Shiohama et al. [65]

2

2

1

NA

NA

42%

NA

NA

Shoji et al. [66]

2

2

1

NA

NA

42%

NA

NA

Smith et al. [67]

3

2

1

1

NA

50%

50%

NA

Sohn et al. [68]

3

4

3

NA

NA

83%

NA

NA

Souriau et al. [69]

3

1

NA

1

NA

NA

42%

NA

Strömland et al. [70]

2

2

2

3

NA

50%

58%

NA

Tellier et al. [71]

3

2

1

NA

4

50%

NA

75%

Thelin and Fussner [72]

2

1

NA

1

NA

NA

33%

NA

Wessels et al. [73]

2

3

1

NA

NA

50%

NA

NA

Wincent et al. [74]

2

3

1

NA

NA

50%

NA

NA

Wulffaert et al. [17]

3

3

2

NA

NA

67%

NA

NA

 

Developmental Delay

Intellectual Disability (ID)

Mild or Moderate ID

Severe or Profound ID

Autism Diagnosis

Aggression

Self-Injurious Behaviour

Obsessive or Compulsive Behaviour

Tactile Defensiveness

Sleep Problems

Abadie et al. [15]

-

70% (45/64)

55% (35/64)

16% (10/64)

54% (25/46)

-

-

-

-

-

Asher et al. [41]

-

100% (14/14)

50% (7/14)

50% (7/14)

-

-

-

-

-

-

Bernstein and Denno [42]

-

90% (26/29)

66% (19/29)

24% (7/29)

-

-

-

72% (21/29)

-

-

Blake and Brown [43]

-

63% (19/30)

-

33% (10/30)

-

-

-

-

-

-

Blake et al. [44]

76% (26/34)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Blake et al. [19]

100% (30/30)

-

-

-

23% (7/30)

53% (16/30)

50% (15/30)

43% (13/30)

40% (12/31)

50% (15/30)

Cheng et al. [45]

-

90% (9/10)

78% (7/9)

11% (1/9)

22% (2/9)

-

-

-

-

17% (2/12)

Dammeyer [46]

-

18% (3/17)

18% (3/17)

-

-

-

-

-

-

88% (15/17)

Davenport et al. [47]

-

100% (7/7)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Deuce et al. [48]

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

9% (4/44)

-

14% (6/44)

Deuce [49]

-

40% (21/52)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

52% (27/52)

Dobbelsteyn et al. [50]

95% (35/37)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Hale et al. [8]

100% (23/23)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Hartshorne et al. [51]

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

57% (50/87)

Hartshorne et al. [18]

85% (45/53)

-

-

-

26% (14/53)

51% (27/53)

47% (25/53)

49% (26/53)

51% (27/53)

58% (31/53)

Hartshorne and Cypher [52]

-

-

-

-

6% (6/100)

38% (38/100)

34% (34/100)

3% (3/100)

53% (53/100)

-

Hartshorne et al. [53]

-

-

-

-

28% (44/160)

-

-

-

-

-

Harvey et al. [54]

-

29% (2/7)

14% (1/7)

14% (1/7)

-

-

-

-

29% (2/7)

-

Hittner et al. [55]

-

100% (7/7)

-

71% (5/7)

-

-

-

-

-

-

Hsu et al. [56]

100% (20/20)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Husu et al. [57]

85% (11/13)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Issekutz et al. [1]

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

44% (7/16)

-

31% (5/16)

Johansson et al. [58]

-

79% (22/28)

36% (10/28)

43% (12/28)

-

68% (19/28)

54% (15/28)

-

-

29% (8/28)

Jongmans et al. [10]

-

74% (23/31)

-

-

37% (17/46)

-

-

-

-

-

Lasserre et al. [59]

-

63% (5/8)

63% (5/8)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Legendre et al. [11]

-

66% (63/96)

-

-

18% (21/117)

-

-

-

-

-

Oley et al. [60]

-

60% (12/20)

-

15% (3/20)

-

-

-

-

-

-

Raqbi et al. [61]

-

53% (11/21)

29% (6/21)

24% (5/21)

14% (3/21)

-

-

-

-

-

Reda and Hartshorne [62]

-

-

-

-

12% (3/25)

-

-

-

40% (10/25)

-

Roger et al. [63]

74% (28/38)

-

-

-

13% (6/45)

-

-

-

-

55% (24/44)

Salem-Hartshorne and Jacob [64]

-

46% (46/100)

-

-

32% (32/100)

-

-

-

-

-

Shiohama et al. [65]

100% (10/10)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Shoji et al. [66]

-

100% (25/25)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Smith et al. [67]

100% (8/8)

100% (11/11)

-

-

60% (6/10)

-

-

-

-

-

Sohn et al. [68]

-

94% (17/18)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Souriau et al. [69]

-

-

-

-

-

42% (27/67)

44% (28/63)

-

-

-

Strömland et al. [70]

82% (23/28)

-

-

-

20% (5/25)

-

-

-

-

-

Tellier et al. [71]

100% (47/47)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

43% (3/7)

Thelin and Fussner [72]

-

-

-

-

-

46% (13/28)

-

-

-

-

Wessels et al. [73]

100% (9/9)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Wincent et al. [74]

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Wulffaert et al. [17]

78% (7/9)

75% (15/20)

35% (7/20)

40% (8/20)

-

-

-

-

-

-

  1. Quality weighting scores for cognition, behaviour and sleep represent the total quality rating (sample identification rating + confirmation of syndrome rating + assessment rating [cognition OR behaviour OR sleep]) as a percentage of the total possible rating (4+4+4 = 12)