Self-injury and aggression in tuberous sclerosis complex: cross syndrome comparison and associated risk markers

Table 5 Binary logistic regression; the association between person characteristics and self-injury, controlling for ID and age

	Β	SE β	Wald’s χ²	P	E^β(odds ratio)
Controlling for level of intellectual disability
Self-injury present × MIPQ; mood subscale	−0.51	0.21	5.99	0.01	0.60
Self-injury present × MIPQ; interest and pleasure subscale score	−0.12	0.09	1.82	0.18	0.89
Self-injury present × TAQ; impulsivity subscale	0.15	0.07	5.30	0.02	1.16
Self-injury present × TAQ; overactivity subscale	0.08	0.04	3.83	0.05	1.08
Self-injury present × RBQ; stereotyped behaviour subscale	0.22	0.10	4.65	0.03	1.25
Self-injury present × RBQ; insistence on sameness	0.31	0.18	3.08	0.08	1.36
Self-injury present × RBQ; repetitive use of language^a	0.34	0.16	4.75	0.03	1.40
Self-injury present × NCCPC total	0.13	0.06	5.02	0.03	1.14
Controlling for age
Self-injury present × MIPQ; mood subscale	−0.70	0.29	5.84	0.02	0.50
Self-injury present × MIPQ; interest and pleasure subscale score	−0.25	0.10	6.00	0.01	0.78
Self-injury present × TAQ; impulsivity subscale	0.15	0.07	4.84	0.03	1.17
Self-injury present × TAQ; overactivity subscale	0.08	0.04	4.14	0.04	1.08
Self-injury present × RBQ; stereotyped behaviour subscale	0.24	0.10	5.38	0.02	1.27
Self-injury present × RBQ; insistence on sameness	0.58	0.25	5.21	0.02	1.78
Self-injury present × RBQ; repetitive use of language^a	0.34	0.16	4.88	0.03	1.41
Self-injury present × NCCPC total	0.12	0.05	7.07	0.01	1.13

^aVerbal participants only; Bold text indicates significant associations between self-injury and person characteristics that remain significant after the influence of level of intellectual disability and age are controlled for.

ISSN: 1866-1955