Skip to main content

Table 3 Therapeutic responses

From: Evidence of neuroinflammation and immunotherapy responsiveness in individuals with down syndrome regression disorder

Therapy typea

Utilization (n (%))

Effectiveness (n (%))

Any neurodiagnostic abnormality vs normal workup

All patients (n = 72)

Any neurodiagnostic abnormality (n = 29)

EEG/MRI/CSF normal (n = 43)

X2 value

p value

Odds ratio (95%CI)

Antidepressant

45 (63%)

22 (49%)

4/16 (25%)

18/29 (62%)

5.67

0.02

0.20 (0.050.79)

Antipsychotic

52 (72%)

32 (61%)

9/19 (47%)

23/33 (70%)

2.54

0.12

0.39 (0.12–1.26)

Benzodiazepines

63 (87%)

49 (77%)

18/24 (75%)

31/39 (79%)

0.17

0.42

0.77 (0.23–2.59)

ECT

49 (68%)

36 (74%)

6/15 (40%)

30/34 (88%)

12.42

0.01

0.09 (0.020.39)

Nutritional therapy

29 (40%)

0 (0%)

0/13 (0%)

0/10 (0%)

0

1.0

n/a

Immunotherapy

Steroids

IVIg

Anti-CD20

MMF/AZ

43 (59%)

39 (54%)

43 (59%)

19 (26%)

19 (26%)

74/120 (62%)

14/39 (36%)

38/43 (88%)

9/19 (47%)

13/19 (68%)

55/74 (74%)

10/24 (42%)

24/26 (92%)

9/11 (81%)

12/13 (92%)

19/46 (41%)

4/15 (27%)

14/17 (82%)

0/8 (0%)

1/6 (17%)

10.04

0.90

0.05

9.89

12.17

< 0.001

0.34

0.33

0.01

0.01

4.11 (1.889.02)

1.96 (0.48–7.99)

2.57 (0.38–17.31)

49.5 (3.84638.43)

60.0 (3.101159.84)

  1. AZ Azathioprine, CSF cerebrospinal fluid, EEG electroencephalogram, ECT electroconvulsive therapy, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, MMF mycophenolate mofetil
  2. aPatients may have received multiple therapeutic interventions creating a higher “n” with regard to the treatment interventions by class