Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographical and phenotypical characteristics of the study sample (n = 28)

From: Outcome measures in Angelman syndrome

 

Frequency

Sex

 Male

14

 Female

14

Genotype

 Deletion

15

 Non-deletion

13

  Paternal uniparental disomy (UPD)

7

  Imprinting center defect (ICD)

1

  UBE3A mutation

5

Epilepsy

 Yes

22

  Yes, active

16

  Yes, controlled with anti-seizure medication

6

 No

6

  No, never

4

  In remission (currently no anti-seizure medication)

2

Socio-economic statusa

 Low-level educationb

1

 Middle-level educationc

16

 High-level educationd

11

Comorbid psychiatric diagnoses

 No psychiatric diagnosis

21

 Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)

6

 Autism spectrum disorder (ASD)

1

Medication use

 Antiseizure medication

  Valproic acid

13

  Clobazam

10

  Levetiracetam

6

  Topiramate

3

  Diazepam, lamotrigin, or ethosuximide

2

  Ethosuximide, gabapentine, clonazepam, lacosamide, brivaracetam, or rufinamide

1

 Psychotropic medication

  Methylphenidate

4

  Risperidone

2

  Aripiprazol

1

 No medication

5

Vision (as reported by parents)

 Normal vision

9

 Farsightede

9

 Strabismus

8

 No stereovision

5

 Nearsightede

4

 Nystagmus

2

Walking abilities

 Walking independently

18

 Walking with support

7

 Wheelchair dependent

3

 

Mean (SD)

Age

11.04 (4.51)

CGI-S scoref

 Total

4.68 (0.78)

 Behavior

4.00 (0.98)

 Motor (fine/gross)

4.68 (0.61)/4.29 (1.33)

 Communication (expressive/receptive)

4.93 (1.05)/3.50 (1.17)

 Sleep

3.46 (1.64)

PEDI-CAT scaled scores (N = 20)g

 Daily activities

47.58 (4.17)

 Mobility

58.26 (5.28)

 Social/cognitive

53.89 (4.62)

  1. Abbreviations: CGI-S Clinical Global Impression of Severity Scale; PEDI-CAT Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer Adaptive Test
  2. aDefined as highest education (average) of both parents
  3. bLow-level education consisted of: no education or primary education only
  4. cMiddle-level education consisted of: secondary education only or middle-level vocational education
  5. dHigh-level education consisted of: high level vocational education, university education, or PhD education
  6. eOnly one participant tolerated wearing glasses, while 12 others were supposed to wear glassed but did not tolerate them
  7. fThe CGI was adapted to the AS population by the authors. A score of 1 represents normal development, 2 is slightly impaired, 3 is mildly impaired, 4 represents moderately impaired, 5 is markedly impaired, 6 is severely impaired, and 7 represents very severe impairments (among the most extremely impaired)
  8. gScaled scores on the PEDI-CAT lay on a continuum of 20 (low function) to 80 (high function) and are not age-related. T-scores were not reported, as more than half of the population had a T-score lower than 10, under which no differentiation was possible