Table 15 Additional data quality measures
Measure | Data quality |
|---|---|
Eye-tracking | |
 - VOF task | For the participants that passed (post)calibration, data loss ranged from 43 to 58% depending on stimulus type. Accuracy was 3.16 degrees visual angle on average (SD = 1.17) for the cartoon stimulus, although it has to be noted that the cartoon stimulus has a large AOI and moved to attract attention, which can explain the accuracy being larger |
 - Social preference task | The average amount of data loss was 43%, while the mean precision (RSM noise level) was 1.26 (SD = 0.69). Accuracy was 0.90 degrees visual angle on average (SD = 0.38) Although the amount of data loss is high, previous studies reported that high amounts of data loss do not necessarily mean that data is not useful [60] |