- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Clinical, genetic, and cognitive correlates of seizure occurrences in Phelan-McDermid syndrome
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders volume 16, Article number: 25 (2024)
Abstract
Background
Phelan-McDermid syndrome (PMS) is a genetic neurodevelopmental disorder caused by SHANK3 haploinsufficiency and is associated with an increased risk for seizures. Previous literature indicates that around one third of individuals with PMS also have epilepsy or seizures, with a wide range of types and ages of onset. Investigating the impact of seizures on intellectual and adaptive functioning for PMS is a primary concern for caregivers and is important to understanding the natural history of this syndrome.
Methods
We report on results from 98 individuals enrolled in a prospective, longitudinal study. We detailed seizure frequency, type, and age of onset, and we analyzed seizure occurrence with best estimate IQ, adaptive functioning, clinical features, and genotype. We conducted multiple linear regression analyses to assess the relationship between the presence of seizures and the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (VABS-II) Adaptive Behavior Composite score and the best estimate full-scale IQ. We also performed Chi-square tests to explore associations between seizure prevalence and genetic groupings. Finally, we performed Chi-square tests and t-tests to explore the relationship between seizures and demographic features, features that manifest in infancy, and medical features.
Results
Seizures were present in 41% of the cohort, and age of onset was widely variable. The presence of seizures was associated with significantly lower adaptive and intellectual functioning. Genotype–phenotype analyses were discrepant, with no differences in seizure prevalence across genetic classes, but with more genes included in deletions of participants with 22q13 deletions and seizures compared to those with 22q13 deletions and no seizures. No clinical associations were found between the presence of seizures and sex, history of pre- or neonatal complications, early infancy, or medical features. In this cohort, generalized seizures were associated with developmental regression, which is a top concern for PMS caregivers.
Conclusions
These results begin to eludicate correlates of seizures in individuals with PMS and highlight the importance of early seizure management. Importantly, presence of seizures was associated with adaptive and cognitive functioning. A larger cohort might be able to identify additional associations with medical features. Genetic findings suggest an increased capability to realize genotype–phenotype relationships when deletion size is taken into account.
Background
Phelan-McDermid syndrome (PMS) is a genetic disorder caused by haploinsufficiency of SHANK3, either by 22q13 deletion or pathogenic sequence variant. In addition to seizures, affected individuals present with a wide spectrum of systemic abnormalities and neurodevelopmental challenges, including autism spectrum disorder (ASD), intellectual disability (ID, often severe to profound), behavioral problems, gastrointestinal problems, and other medical features including renal and cardiac abnormalities [1,2,3,4].
Seizures are among the most complex comorbidities to manage and represent a main concern of caregivers [5,6,7]. The pooled prevalence of seizures based on prior literature is 32% [8]. Individual studies have a prevalence ranging from 17 to 70% (see [8]). Reported seizure types include atypical absence, tonic, atonic, tonic–clonic, and myoclonic seizures. Seizure frequency spans a wide range, from a single lifetime seizure to intractable epilepsy with hundreds of daily seizures [8,9,10]. Many abnormal electroencephalogram (EEG) findings are reported in individuals with PMS and seizures, including slowing or absence of the occipital dominant rhythm and multifocal paroxysmal abnormalities [8, 9]. Abnormal EEG findings have also been reported in PMS individuals without seizures, including slow occipital dominant rhythm or focal spike and slow wave activity [8, 9].
There is limited information about factors which predict prevalence or severity of seizures in PMS. A recent large genotype–phenotype study in PMS has suggested that there is no statistically significant difference in prevalence of epilepsy when comparing those with sequence variants and Class 1 deletions (deletions including only SHANK3 or SHANK3 in combination with ARSA and/or ACR and RABL2B) versus those with Class 2 deletions (all other deletions). The prevalence of epilepsy was 26% (19/73) in the former and 27% (22/83) in the latter [11]. Additional literature has found no statistically significant differences between seizure prevalence in individuals with sequence variants (7/10) as compared to those with deletions (15/36) but did identify that deletion size was larger in individuals with seizures compared to those without seizures [10].
Furthermore, it is unclear whether other clinical features of PMS are related to presence of seizures. Investigating if seizures affect intellectual and adaptive functioning, for example, is important to understanding the natural history of this syndrome and represents a key caregiver concern [5]. Identifying associations with clinical features in infancy or early childhood may also predict who may be at a greater risk of developing seizures.
Here, we present the findings from a natural history study in PMS, focusing this analysis on seizure characteristics. We hypothesize that the presence of seizures is associated with lower cognitive and adaptive functioning. We performed additional exploratory analyses comparing genetic and clinical features to seizure occurrence.
Methods
Study participants
We performed analysis of longitudinal data collected from a prospective, multi-site, observational study evaluating the phenotype and natural history of PMS (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02461420). Eligibility criteria included presence of a chromosomal 22q13 deletion including SHANK3 or a pathogenic SHANK3 sequence variant; ability to understand English; age 3–21 years at time of enrollment. All SHANK3 variants were classified as likely pathogenic or pathogenic according to ACMG-AMP criteria [12], all were de novo when both parental samples were available for testing. Genetic information including breakpoints for deletions and variant information are provided in Supplemental Table 1. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, 5th Edition (DSM-5) ASD diagnoses were made upon review of Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, 2nd Edition and/or Autism Diagnostic Interview – Revised, along with a clinical evaluation [13,14,15].
Seizure characteristics
Seizure history was collected through a clinical interview with caregivers with review of medical records when available. Interval histories were collected at each follow up timepoint. Caregivers were asked if their child had any seizure and if so, if they had febrile seizures. They were also asked about a formal epilepsy diagnosis. A separate interview form assessed seizure characteristics where caregivers were asked about the type and subtype of seizures, as well as onset date. Caregiver report was based on prior clinical assessment of seizures and medical records of these assessments were provided when available. This study did not involve clinical EEGs, MRIs, or other seizure assessments. Seizure types were organized according to the International League Against Epilepsy guidelines: focal (including with impairment of consciousness, without impairment of consciousness, evolving to secondary generalization); generalized (including motor subtypes: tonic–clonic, myoclonic, clonic, tonic, atonic, and epileptic spasms and nonmotor (absence seizures) [16]; and seizure not classifiable as focal or generalized. If seizure type was not reported, it was considered unclassified. Prevalence of seizure is defined as occurrence at any time point in the study; however, when conducting linear regressions with baseline adaptive and cognitive measures (see below), we used seizure prevalence at the baseline timepoint in the study. We did not differentiate between provoked and unprovoked seizure or between seizure in the setting of an epilepsy diagnosis vs. seizure in absence of epilepsy diagnosis. We did not quantify seizure frequency but rather whether the seizure type was present or not. We defined having any seizures as having one or more of the following seizure types: focal, generalized, unclassified epileptic event; this included febrile seizures. Date of seizure onset was collected whenever possible; age of seizure onset was calculated from onset of seizure and date of birth. Supplemental Tables 2 and 3 display seizure proportions and age of onset in participants with a reported epilepsy diagnosis.
Analysis of seizure prevalence with adaptive functioning and cognitive ability
Multiple linear regression analyses assessed the relationship between the presence of seizures at the time of baseline assessment and the baseline Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (VABS-II) Adaptive Behavior Composite standard score, as well as the baseline best estimate full-scale IQ. The composite score is a standard score with a general population mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15. Best estimate IQ was generated, which combines standard IQ scores for those who were in age range of cognitive assessment and ratio IQ estimates for those who were out of range for cognitive tests and/or who performed at the floor of IQ testing; tests included the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, 5th Edition, the Differential Abilities Scales, 2nd Edition, and the Mullen Scales of Early Learning [17, 18, 19]. VABS-II scores and best estimate IQ scores were used from the baseline timepoint. Covariates were added to the model, including age, ASD diagnosis, and genetic group (Class 1 deletions, Class 2 deletions, sequence variants). The analyses were done with baseline seizure status and baseline VABS-II and full scale IQ (FSIQ). Additional covariates including sex, age of onset of seizures, and family history of seizures were not significant and did not remain in the model. Separate models assessed the relationship of 1) any seizures 2) generalized seizures and 3) focal seizures.
Genotype–phenotype associations
Chi-square tests explored if there were differences between seizure prevalence at any timepoint in the study and genetic groupings (class 1 deletions, class 2 deletions, sequence variants). Class 1 deletions are 22q13 deletions that include only SHANK3 with or without the deletion of ARSA, ACR, and RABL2B. These latter three genes are not expected to contribute to the phenotype of PMS because they are not constrained for protein truncating variants (pLI = 0 in gnomAD database). ARSA is associated with a known autosomal recessive disorder. Class 2 deletions are larger deletions that do not qualify as Class 1 deletions (i.e., including the deletion of any other genes in addition to SHANK3 and the three mentioned above). Sequence variants are pathogenic sequence variants within the SHANK3 gene. For participants with deletions, the number of genes included in the deletion was evaluated using hg19 coordinates. Wilcoxon tests explored if the presence of any seizures (focal, generalized, unclassified) and seizure types (focal, generalized) were associated with the number of genes deleted. This analysis was able to explore the relationship with the size of deletion rather than grouping all deletions that extend past ARSA into one group. Lastly, we described prevalence of seizures in participants with PMS who have a ring chromosme 22.
Clinical associations
Chi square tests and t-tests explored if the presence of any seizures at any timepoint (focal, generalized, unclassified) were associated with demographic features, early infancy features, and medical features. Additional exploratory chi square tests examined if developmental regression was associated with any seizure, generalized seizures, or focal seizures.
Developmental regression was measured by the Autism Diagnostic Interview, Regression Supplement and by caregiver report during the clinical exam at each timepoint. Regression was defined by the loss of skills previously obtained for at least 3Â months. Skills captured in the Regression Supplement are early skills (e.g., crawling, pointing, walking, babbling). Loss at any age was included in analyses; analyses did not differentiate between the two peaks of regression in PMS (childhood, adolescent). Age of skill loss was recorded for the skill regressions. Chi square tests assessed the relationship between history of skill regression and the presence of any seizures, generalized seizures, and focal seizures. For participants with both seizure and skill loss history, ages of each were compared to assess if skill loss came before or after seizures.
Medication and seizure management
Anti-seizure medication (ASM) use was collected through caregiver survey. Changes to medications were reported through interval history forms during follow-up visits. Similarly, surgical history was collected through caregiver survey at baseline and each follow-up visit.
Results
Study participants
Ninety-eight participants were included in analyses and 45/98 (46%) were female. Average age at time of enrollment was 8.8 (4.6) years, with a range of 3–21 years. At baseline, mean VABS-II composite score was 51.2 (13.9), and best estimate IQ was 26.2 (17.8). There were 26 participants with Class 1 deletions, 53 with Class 2 deletions, and 19 with sequence variants.
Seizure characteristics
Through the course of the study, 42% (41/98) of the cohort reported a history of any seizure type, including generalized seizures (27%, 26/98); focal seizures (20%, 20/98), or unclassified seizure type (13%, 13/98) (Table 1). Two participants reported febrile seizures only, which were included in any seizure type and unclassified seizure type. Prevalence of specific generalized and focal seizure subtypes are shown in Table 1. Caregivers of 19 participants reported a formal epilepsy diagnosis; seizure subtypes for participants with a reported epilepsy diagnosis are located in Supplemental Tables 2 and 3.
There were 12 participants with generalized seizures only, five with focal seizures only, and eight with unclassified seizures only; 13 participants had both generalized and focal seizures. Two participants had generalized, focal, and unclassified seizures reported, and one participant had generalized and unspecified seizures reported. True count and prevalence of generalized and focal seizures may be different as unspecified seizures can be either focal or generalized. For participants who reported the date of seizure onset, average age of onset of each type of seizure is displayed in Table 2 and Fig. 1.
Association of seizure prevalence with adaptive functioning and cognitive ability
At baseline, presence of any seizures, generalized seizures, and focal seizures were all significant predictors of the VABS-II composite standard score. The composite score was 8.73 [-13.3- -4.2] points lower in individuals with any seizures compared to those without seizures, while controlling for age, ASD diagnosis, and genetic grouping (p = 0.0003) (Fig. 2). The presence of focal seizures had a similar impact, though with more variability, with a composite score 8.07 [-14.8- -1.4] points lower in those with focal seizures, while controlling for age, ASD diagnosis, and genetic grouping (p = 0.019). Generalized seizures had a slightly greater impact on the composite score, where those with generalized seizures had a score 9.90 [-15.6- -4.2] points lower than individuals without generalized seizures, while controlling for the same covariates (p = 0.0008). Bonferonni corrections for multiple comparisons would provide an alpha of 0.017, leaving the categories of any seizures and generalized seizures remaining statistically significant and the category of focal seizures just above the threshold for statistical significance.
Similarly, presence of any seizures, generalized seizures, and focal seizures at baseline were all significant predictors of best estimate full-scale IQ. Best estimate FSIQ was 8.74 [-14.6- -2.9] points lower in individuals with any seizures compared to those without seizures, while controlling for age, ASD diagnosis, and genetic grouping (p = 0.004) (Fig. 3). Best estimate FSIQ was 10.14 [-18.6- -1.7] points lower in those with focal seizures compared to individuals without focal seizures, while controlling for age, ASD diagnosis, and genetic grouping (p = 0.025), again showing wider variability. Generalized seizures had the greatest impact on FSIQ where those with seizures had a score 11.33 [-18.5- -4.13] points lower than individuals without generalized seizures, while controlling for the same covariates (p = 0.002). Bonferonni corrections for multiple comparisons would provide an alpha of 0.017, leaving any seizure and generalized seizures significant and focal seizures just over the significance value.
When assessing cognitive and adaptive scores within participants with seizures across either one (generalized or focal) or two (generalized and focal) seizure types at baseline, participants with two seizure types tended to have lower, but not significantly lower, scores, compared to participants with only one seizure type. Using the same model with age, genetics, and ASD held constant, participants with both generalized and focal seizures at baseline had an Adaptive Behavior Composite score 5.30 points lower [-14.7 – 4.1] (p = 0.25), and an FSIQ points 7.79 lower [-18.3 – 2.7] (p = 0.14) than individuals with only focal or generalized seizures.
Genotype–phenotype associations
No differences were found between genetic subgroups and the presence of seizures or any specific type of seizure at any timepoint. Eight of 26 (31%) subjects with a Class 1 deletion, 26/53 (49%) of subjects with a Class 2 deletion, and 7/19 (37%) with a sequence variant reported any seizure type (p = 0.27). 3/26 (12%) with a Class 1 deletion, 17/53 (32%) with a Class 2 deletion, and 6/19 (32%) with a sequence variant reported generalized seizures (p = 0.13). Five of 26 (19%), 11/53 (21%), and 4/19 (21%) of the Class 1, Class 2, and sequence variant group reported focal seizures, respectively (p = 0.98).
Among participants with chromosomal deletions (n = 79), those who had any seizure type had a median of 71 (IQR: 68) genes deleted as compared to individuals without seizures who had a median of 25 (41) genes deleted (p = 0.002) (Fig. 4). Participants with chromosomal deletions and generalized seizures had median of 72 (43) genes deleted as compared 31 (45) for those without generalized seizures (p = 0.0005). No significant differences were found in the presence of focal seizures, where subjects with chromosomal deletions and seizures had a median of 89 (89) genes deleted compared to 39 (49) in individuals without focal seizures. The differences in any seizures and generalized seizures were significant after Bonferonni corrections, with an alpha of 0.017.
Individuals with PMS who have a ring chromosome had a similar seizure prevalence (2/6, 33%) compared to the rest of the cohort. These two participants both had focal and generalized seizures.
Clinical associations
The presence of any seizures at any timepoint was not associated with any demographic, pre- or neonatal complications, early infancy features, or medical features (Table 3).
Developmental regression was not significantly associated with any seizure type or focal seizures at any timepoint, but was associated with generalized seizures (p = 0.003). Of the 26 subjects with generalized seizures, 18 (69%) of them had a reported developmental regression. Of the 72 participants without generalized seizures, 24 (33%) had a reported regression. For participants who reported both age of first seizure and age of regression, 13/16 (81%) had a reported regression prior to a seizure while the remaining 3/16 (19%) had a reported regression after a first seizure.
Medication and seizure management
Participants used multiple different ASMs. The three most commonly used ASMs were levetiracetam, valproic acid, and lamotrigine (Table 4). Of those who ever used ASMs (n = 25), over half (n = 15) used only one ASM, while 10 participants used two or more ASMs, and one participant used 7 different ASMs. Use of as needed diazepam and midazolam were not included in ASM counts. One participant had a corpus callosotomy for refractory epilepsy, five years later the patient had a placement of a vagus nerve stimulator, which was replaced four years after that.
Discussion
The prevalence of seizures in this cohort (42%) was similar, though slightly higher, than the previously reported pooled prevalence of 35% [8]. The frequency of seizure types is also representative of past literature, where absence seizures are the most common single finding, reported in 14 of the 41 participants with seizures (34%), followed by generalized tonic–clonic seizures which were reported in 13 of 41 (32%) of participants with seizures. This varies from the general population where focal seizures are considered more common in both children and adults [20], but is similar to some other neurodevelopmental disorders where generalized seizures are more frequent, such as Angelman syndrome [21].
Analyses of the age of onset of seizures showed no definitive point at which the risk for development of seizures comes to an end. On average, the onset of generalized seizures was 2.6 years earlier than the average onset of focal seizures. For individuals with generalized seizures, 75% had onset prior to 10 years old. The remaining 25% had onset that was largely variable, occurring through early adulthood. The risk for new onset generalized seizures does appear to lessen as individuals get older. For those with focal seizures, 47% had onset prior to 10 years old, an additional 40% of participants had onset between 10 and 15 years old, and the remaining subjects had onset in adulthood. This result is limited by the amount of data available for onset age but may indicate a difference in the pattern of onset between generalized and focal seizures in PMS. Additionally, this study only included participants who were 3–21 years old at time of enrollment, so seizure onset later than these ages was not captured.
Analyses of adaptive and intellectual functioning indicated that the presence of seizures was associated with lower scores. Individuals with seizures are estimated to have scores over half a standard deviation lower than individuals without seizures, after accounting for covariates including age and genotype. This finding was consistent across seizure types, with generalized seizures appearing to have the greatest magnitude of impact with intellectual and adaptive functioning. Results from focal seizure analyses were just above the alpha level using Bonferroni correction methods. As the onset of generalized seizures tended to be younger, the age of onset of seizures was explored as predictor of adaptive and intellectual scores, however, was not statistically significant. This may be due to the limited information on onset age and/or may indicate more complex etiology for the effect of generalized seizures and intellectual functioning. Literature in the general epilepsy population has shown negative relationships with cognitive functioning, with similar impairment due to focal and generalized seizures, and has suggested that younger onset of seizures is associated with more impairment [22, 23].
Identifying early onset clinical features associated with seizures may help shed light on which individuals with PMS may be at a greater risk of seizure development. Congenital features, such as cardiac and renal anomalies or complications such as preterm birth were not associated with seizures in this cohort. Additionally, infancy traits such as lethargy or decreased alertness were not associated with seizures. Features that reflect differences in brain morphology and growth such as microcephaly or macrocephaly also did not show associations with seizures in this cohort. Larger cohorts may be able to identify possible significant clinical associations. Additionally, older age was not associated with increased seizure prevalence in this cohort, unlike previously reported cohorts [1].
Type of genetic variation is another potential strategy to personalize seizure risk estimates. However, similar to past literature, results are not clear. There was no difference in the prevalence of seizures across participants with Class 1 (smaller), Class 2 (larger) deletions or SHANK3 sequence variants, indicating that loss of SHANK3 is a key factor in the etiology of seizures in PMS. However, when analyzing the number of genes deleted per participant against seizure prevalence, results showed individuals with deletions including more genes had a higher seizure rate, and specifically a higher generalized seizure rate. This implies that genes in the 22q13 region other than SHANK3 may be implicated in the risk for generalized seizures. Clustering participants into genetic groups can aid in the interpretation of results, specifically to assess differences between sequence variants and Class 1 deletions (only SHANK3 involvement) to Class 2 deletions (SHANK3 plus other genes) but may miss differences within those classified as Class 2.
Developmental regression is a top concern for PMS caregivers, and to date it remains unclear why some individuals with PMS experience regression. Previous literature in PMS is conflicting as to whether regression and presence of seizures are related. In this cohort, generalized, but not focal, seizures were associated with regression, again pointing to a difference in severity of phenotype for those with generalized seizures. Upon review of the ages of seizures and regression, it appears most participants experienced a developmental regression prior to the onset of seizures. Though directionality cannot be assessed, these results do not suggest that seizures are a risk factor to a future regression.
Sixty-one percent of participants with seizures reported taking at least one ASM. The most common were levetiracetam, valproic acid, and lamotrigine. No specific recommendations exist for seizure management within PMS, other than standard epilepsy practice [6, 7]. Results show that over half (60%) of individuals with PMS and epilepsy who require medication have only ever used 1 ASM, which suggests seizures have been well controlled.
Conclusions
Seizures are a common feature of PMS that carry a heavy burden for individuals and their caregivers. Results from this study indicate that seizures are associated with lower intellectual and adaptive functioning. Although seizure management should always be optimized, it is not clear there is a causative relationship between seizures and lower cognitive functioning, and the seizures may just reflect a pre-existing more severe synaptopathy which also drives the higher level of impairment. This concept is supported by the relationship between seizures and deletion of a larger number of genes, and that seizures did not often precede regression. Seizures are associated with premature mortality in the general population [24, 25] and cases of premature mortality in individuals with PMS have been reported, again underscoring the importance of targeted research and therapy development. There are no approved therapies targeting seizures in individuals with PMS yet, though clinical trials are underway. This study was limited by selection bias, where those with medical features such as epilepsy are more likely to be offered genetic testing, and therefore diagnosed with PMS, potentially overinflating the true prevalence of seizures in this disorder. The sample size was robust for a rare disease study but may be underpowered to identify clinical correlates of seizures. Lastly, we did not review EEG data, differentiate between unprovoked and provoked seizures, or differentiate between seizures in the setting of an epilepsy diagnosis (2 + unprovoked seizures or 1 unprovoked seizure with high chance of future seizures) vs. seizures generically (unprovoked, provoked, single lifetime seizure, etc.). Seizure types and epilepsy diagnoses were obtained from caregiver report and medical records when available, rather than prospective EEGs, representing another limitation of this study. Future studies with larger cohorts should re-evaluate early onset features of disease manifesting early in life that may pre-date seizure onset in PMS to help identify those at greater risk.
Availability of data and materials
Clinical data presented here have been deposited in the National Database for Autism Research (NDAR), an NIH-funded data repository that stores and shares data pertaining to Autism Spectrum Disorder with qualified researchers.
Abbreviations
- ASD:
-
Autism Spectrum Disorder
- ASM:
-
Anti-Seizure Medication
- DSM-5:
-
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, 5th Edition
- EEG:
-
Electroencephalogram
- FSIQ:
-
Full Scale IQ
- gnomAD:
-
Genome Aggregation Database
- ID:
-
Intellectual Disability
- pLI:
-
Probability of Loss-of-Function Intolerance
- PMS:
-
Phelan-Mcdermid Syndrome
- VABS-II:
-
Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition
References
Sarasua SM, Boccuto L, Sharp JL, Dwivedi A, Chen CF, Rollins JD, et al. Clinical and genomic evaluation of 201 patients with Phelan-McDermid syndrome. Hum Genet. 2014;133(7):847–59.
Nevado J, GarcÃa-Miñaúr S, Palomares-Bralo M, VallespÃn E, Guillén-Navarro E, Rosell J, et al. Variability in Phelan-McDermid syndrome in a cohort of 210 individuals. Front Genet. 2022;13:652454.
Oberman LM, Boccuto L, Cascio L, Sarasua S, Kaufmann WE. Autism spectrum disorder in Phelan-McDermid syndrome: initial characterization and genotype-phenotype correlations. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2015;10:105.
Soorya L, Kolevzon A, Zweifach J, Lim T, Dobry Y, Schwartz L, et al. Prospective investigation of autism and genotype-phenotype correlations in 22q13 deletion syndrome and SHANK3 deficiency. Mol Autism. 2013;4(1):18.
GarcÃa-Bravo C, MartÃnez-Piédrola RM, GarcÃa-Bravo S, RodrÃguez-Pérez MP, MartÃn-Gómez AS, Fernández-Gómez G, Palacios-Ceña D. Living with and managing seizures among parents of children diagnosed with Phelan-McDermid syndrome: a qualitative study using in-depth interviews. Eur J Pediatr. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-023-05285-6.
de Coo IFM, Jesse S, Le TL, Sala C. Consensus recommendations on Epilepsy in Phelan-McDermid syndrome. Eur J Med Genet. 2023;66(6):104746.
Srivastava S, Sahin M, Buxbaum JD, Berry-Kravis E, Soorya LV, Thurm A, et al. Updated consensus guidelines on the management of Phelan-McDermid syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2023;191(8):2015–44.
Holder JL Jr, Quach MM. The spectrum of epilepsy and electroencephalographic abnormalities due to SHANK3 loss-of-function mutations. Epilepsia. 2016;57(10):1651–9.
Figura MG, Coppola A, Bottitta M, Calabrese G, Grillo L, Luciano D, et al. Seizures and EEG pattern in the 22q13.3 deletion syndrome: clinical report of six Italian cases. Seizure. 2014;23(9):774–9.
Jain L, Oberman LM, Beamer L, Cascio L, May M, Srikanth S, et al. Genetic and metabolic profiling of individuals with Phelan-McDermid syndrome presenting with seizures. Clin Genet. 2022;101(1):87–100.
Levy T, Foss-Feig JH, Betancur C, Siper PM, Trelles-Thorne MDP, Halpern D, et al. Strong evidence for genotype-phenotype correlations in Phelan-McDermid syndrome: results from the developmental synaptopathies consortium. Hum Mol Genet. 2022;31(4):625–37.
Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17(5):405–24.
Lord C, Rutter M, DiLavore P, Risi S, Gotham K, Bishop S, Gutrie W. (ADOS-2) Manual (Part I): modules 1–4. Autism diagnostic observation schedule. 2012.
Lord C, Rutter M, Le Couteur A. Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised: a revised version of a diagnostic interview for caregivers of individuals with possible pervasive developmental disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 1994;24(5):659–85.
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders : DSM-5. American Psychiatric A, American Psychiatric Association DSMTF, editors. Arlington: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
Fisher RS, Cross JH, French JA, Higurashi N, Hirsch E, Jansen FE, et al. Operational classification of seizure types by the International League Against Epilepsy: Position Paper of the ILAE Commission for Classification and Terminology. Epilepsia. 2017;58(4):522–30.
Mullen EM. Mullen scales of early learning manual: American Guidance Service. 1995.
Roid GH, Pomplun M. The stanford-binet intelligence scales: The Guilford Press. 2012.
Elliot C. Differential abilities scale—2nd edition (DAS-II) manual. Harcourt Assessment. 2007.
Beghi E. The Epidemiology of Epilepsy. Neuroepidemiology. 2019;54(2):185–91.
Samanta D. Epilepsy in Angelman syndrome: a scoping review. Brain Dev. 2021;43(1):32–44.
Mohamed IN, Osman AH, Mohamed S, Hamid EK, Hamed AA, Alsir A, et al. Intelligence quotient (IQ) among children with epilepsy: National epidemiological study – Sudan. Epilepsy Behav. 2020;103:106813.
Gauffin H, Landtblom AM, Vigren P, Frick A, Engström M, McAllister A, Karlsson T. Similar profile and magnitude of cognitive impairments in focal and generalized epilepsy: a pilot study. Front Neurol. 2021;12:746381.
Sillanpää M, Schmidt D. Long-term outcome of medically treated epilepsy. Seizure. 2017;44:211–6.
Thurman DJ, Logroscino G, Beghi E, Hauser WA, Hesdorffer DC, Newton CR, et al. The burden of premature mortality of epilepsy in high-income countries: a systematic review from the Mortality Task Force of the International League Against Epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2017;58(1):17–26.
Acknowledgements
We thank all of our patients and families for their dedication to research in Phelan-McDermid syndrome. We thank the Phelan-McDermid Syndrome Foundation for their continued support to our research and for financial support for participant travel.
Members of the Developmental Synaptopathies Consortium (DSC)
Mustafa Sahin4,5
Alexander Kolevzon1,2,3,21
Joseph D. Buxbaum1,2,3,18,19,20
Elizabeth Berry-Kravis11,12,13
Latha Valluripalli Soorya16
Audrey Thurm17
Craig M. Powell14,15
Jonathan A. Bernstein10
Nominated consortia representative – Dr. Mustafa Sahin || mustafa.sahin@childrens.harvard.edu
Conflicts of interest
TL receives funding from the Phelan-McDermid Syndrome Foundation and is on the advisory board of the CHAMP1 research foundation.
AK is on the Advisory Board for the Klingenstein Third Generation Foundation, Ovid Therapeutics, David Lynch Foundation, ADNP Kids Research Foundation, and Ritrova Therapeutics and consults to Acadia, Alkermes, Jaguar Therapeutics, GW Pharmaceuticals, Neuren Pharmaceuticals, Clinilabs Drug Development Corporation, Scioto Biosciences, and Biogen.
EBK has received funding from Seaside Therapeutics, Novartis, Roche, Alcobra, Neuren, Cydan, Fulcrum, GW, Neurotrope, Marinus, Zynerba, BioMarin, Ovid, Retrophin, AMO, Yamo, Acadia, Avexis, Ionis, Ultragenyx, Lumos, GeneTx, and Vtesse/Sucampo/Mallinkcrodt Pharmaceuticals to consult on trial design or development strategies and/or conduct clinical trials in FXS or other NDDs or neurodegenerative disorders, and from Asuragen Inc to develop testing standards for FMR1 testing. All funding to EBK is directed to Rush University Medical Center to support rare disease programs. EBK receives no personal funds.
MS reports grant support from Novartis, Roche, Biogen, Astellas, Aeovian, Bridgebio, Aucta and Quadrant Biosciences. He has served on Scientific Advisory Boards for Roche, Celgene, Regenxbio, Alkermes and Takeda.
CMP reports no conflicts relevant to the present study other than having been funded by Novartis in the past to study potential biomarkers in PMS. He has been reimbursed for travel by Psychogenics, Astra-Zeneca, Roche, Pfizer, and Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma Co. in the past.
SS has received consulting fees from GLG, Guidepoint (which connected to a client, Fortress Biotech), Novartis, ExpertConnect, Stoke Therapeutics., and Neuren.
Funding
This study was funded, in part, by the National Institute of Health Developmental Synaptopathies Consortium (U54NS092090). The Developmental Synaptopathies Consortium (U54NS092090) is part of the Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network (RDCRN), an initiative of the Office of Rare Diseases Research (ORDR), National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS). S.S. receives funding from the NIH (K23NS119666).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Contributions
TL: Data analysis, interpretation of data, drafted and revised manuscript; JG: revised manuscript; PMS: study conception and design, data acquisition, revised manuscript; DH: data acquisition, revised manuscript; JZ: data acquisition, revised manuscript; RFD: data acquisition, revised manuscript; JLH: revised manuscript; MPT: study conception and design, data acquisition, revised manuscript; KK: revised manuscript; JAB: study conception and design, revised manuscript; EBK: study conception and design, revised manuscript; CMP: study conception and design, revised manuscript; LVS: study conception and design, revised manuscript; AT: study conception and design, revised manuscript; JDB: study conception and design, revised manuscript; AK: study conception and design, revised manuscript; SS: study conception and design, revised manuscript. All authors have approved the submitted version (and any substantially modified version that involves the author's contribution to the study) and have agreed both to be personally accountable for the author's own contributions and to ensure that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work, even ones in which the author was not personally involved, are appropriately investigated, resolved, and the resolution documented in the literature.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The Boston Children’s Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved the study, serving as the central IRB for all the participating study sites. Caregivers or legal guardians of the participants provided informed consent and assent was obtained when applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Levy, T., Gluckman, J., Siper, P.M. et al. Clinical, genetic, and cognitive correlates of seizure occurrences in Phelan-McDermid syndrome. J Neurodevelop Disord 16, 25 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11689-024-09541-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s11689-024-09541-0