Skip to main content

Trajectories of imitation skills in preschoolers with autism spectrum disorders



Imitation skills play a crucial role in social cognitive development from early childhood. Many studies have shown a deficit in imitation skills in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Little is known about the development of imitation behaviors in children with ASD. This study aims to measure the trajectories of early imitation skills in preschoolers with ASD and how these skills impact other areas of early development.


For this purpose, we assessed imitation, language, and cognition skills in 177 children with ASD and 43 typically developing children (TD) aged 2 to 5 years old, 126 of which were followed longitudinally, yielding a total of 396 time points.


Our results confirmed the presence of an early imitation deficit in toddlers with ASD compared to TD children. The study of the trajectories showed that these difficulties were marked at the age of 2 years and gradually decreased until the age of 5 years old. Imitation skills were strongly linked with cognitive and language skills and level of symptoms in our ASD group at baseline. Moreover, the imitation skills at baseline were predictive of the language gains a year later in our ASD group. Using a data-driven clustering method, we delineated different developmental trajectories of imitation skills within the ASD group.


The clinical implications of the findings are discussed, particularly the impact of an early imitation deficit on other areas of competence of the young child.


Imitation skills play a crucial role in early development and are considered an essential component of social and cognitive development during the first years of life. Indeed, during the 2 first years of life, children gradually increase their imitative behaviors both in frequency and complexity, along with the development of their cognitive and social abilities [1]. Children imitate their siblings, peers, and parents at every moment to learn new abilities [2, 3]. Imitation is an essential lever for learning of new motor skills [4] and cognitive skills [5,6,7]. Besides the role in learning, imitation has an important social function ([8], as cited in [9]). From the earliest moments, caregivers and infants engage in reciprocal imitation during face-to-face interactions. Through this choreography of imitating each other’s vocalizations and facial expressions, they will share social interest and affective states, take turns, and build a foundation for the development of complex social skills. Indeed, the literature has amply demonstrated that imitation plays a vital role in the development of social communication [10, 11].

The disruption in early imitation skills can have a tremendous repercussion on various developmental aspects, especially socio-communicative development that is altered in autism. Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by impairments in social communication, interaction, and restricted patterns of interests and activities [12]. Indeed, a large body of literature has highlighted broad imitation deficits in children with ASD [1, 13,14,15,16,17,18] using various imitation measures [1]. Early imitation deficits were linked to difficulties in social communication skills, such as language [19, 20], joint attention [21], and social interaction difficulties [9]. In addition, such a deficit could hinder the effectiveness of intervention methods for children with ASD, as many of them rely upon imitation to teach new abilities [22,23,24]. Given the critical role that the imitation skills play in typical development, precise characterization of the deficit in this domain in ASD is of utmost importance.

Even though imitation difficulties in ASD are relatively well-documented, the developmental trajectories of imitation have received less attention to date in this population. Prospective studies following infants at risk of developing ASD report difficulties in imitation skills in children later diagnosed with ASD from 12 months of age. For example, Young et al. [25] conducted a longitudinal study with 248 children between 12 and 24 months of age and found a delayed imitation development in children who developed ASD by age 3 years compared to the TD group. Likewise, Poon et al. [20] found that infants of 9–12 months of age who are later diagnosed with ASD show a considerable delay in imitation skills. These results have led some research groups to explore if imitation could be used for screening ASD in high-risk siblings. Rowberry et al. [26], for instance, found that poor imitation reported by parents in the First Year Inventory (FYI) [27] can be an early marker of ASD in 12-month-old high-risk siblings. The results of the various studies cited above highlight this imitative deficit in young children with ASD and the importance of increasing and detailing knowledge about the development of this crucial skill and the consequences of such difficulties.

The present study aims to compare the developmental trajectories of imitative skills between preschoolers with ASD and a group of matched TD children, using a total of 396 longitudinal assessments collected between the age of 2 and 5 years old. Based on previous literature [1, 13,14,15,16,17,18], we expected a delayed development of imitation skills in children with ASD in comparison to TD children. Second, we investigated how imitation skills related to the level of symptoms and cognitive and communication skills in the ASD group at baseline and after 1 year to explore the consequences of this deficit on the different development areas. We hypothesized that a deficit in imitation skills is linked with the severity of symptoms and difficulties in developmental domains at the baseline and 1 year after [19, 20]. Finally, we explored the extent to which there could be different imitation trajectories inside the ASD group, as this population is characterized by a great heterogeneity of profiles and manifestations [28].

Material and methods


The participants in this study were recruited as part of the Geneva Autism Cohort [29,30,31,32,33,34]. The University’s Institutional Review Board approved this study. All families provided written informed consent to participate. For the current study, a total of 220 participants were included, 177 with ASD and 43 typically developing children (TD) (see Table 1 and Table S1 in Supplementary Materials). Among these, 126 were followed longitudinally, yielding a total of 396 time points (78 subjects had 2, 46 had 3, and 2 participants had 4 time points), each time point was separated by 12 months, except for two children for whom the two time points are separated by 24 months (see Fig. 1). The inclusion criterion for the ASD group was a clinical diagnosis of autism according to the DSM-5 criteria [12]. The clinical diagnosis was confirmed by the scores exceeding the cut-off for autism at the ADOS-G [35] or ADOS-2 [36] (see the “Measures” section for more details). Children from the TD group had no developmental concerns and no first or second-degree family member diagnosed with autism and were all administered the ADOS diagnostic test to exclude the presence of ASD symptoms (see Table 1). Participants were aged between 2.0 and 5.0 years, and the two groups did not differ by age (U = 351, p = 0.429) nor sex (p = 0.156).

Table 1 Statistical comparison between children with ASD and children with TD at baseline in terms of demographic, clinical, and cognitive features
Fig. 1
figure 1

Data distribution available for each group from our longitudinal study. Circles (red = ASD, blue = TD) denote visits/time points; repeated visits of the same subject are connected with a dotted line



For the measure of imitation skills, we used the Visuo-Motor Imitation scale of the PEP-3 [37]. This scale includes 10 items of imitation, assessed on a 3-point scale (0 = absence of imitation; 1 = unclear, partial, or prompted imitation; 2 = complete imitation of the skill) (for a detailed description of the Visuo-Motor Imitation scale, please refer to Supplementary Materials). Raw scores range between 0 and 20, which allows enough variability to highlight the heterogeneity of imitation profiles.

The scale comprises the imitation of familiar actions and imitation with explicit instruction. Vivanti and Hamilton [1] distinguished two types of imitation that we find in this scale: true imitation (copying both the mean and the goal of the action) and stimulus enhancement (perform a specific action on a stimulus after having been made attentive to this stimulus by another person). For instance, one item of the PEP-3 is to organize a fake birthday party to explore imitation of daily actions like eating etc. (stimulus enhancement). For another one, the examiner touches her/his nose and says “Now it’s your turn” (true imitation of meaningless actions).

Level of symptoms of autism

Each participant was assessed with the Autism Diagnosis Observation Schedule, 2nd edition [36], or Autism Diagnosis Observation Schedule, Generic (ADOS-G; [35]). For subjects who underwent the earlier ADOS version (ADOS-G) assessment, the scores were transformed according to the revised ADOS algorithm [38] to ensure comparability with ADOS-2. The ADOS Calibrated Severity Score (ADOS-CCS; [38]), a measure of symptom severity relatively independent of language levels and age, was then used for all subjects included in this study.

Developmental functioning

Mullen Scale of Early Learning

Developmental functioning of all children included in the present study was assessed with the Psychoeducational Profile, 3rd edition [37]. Nevertheless, as our aim was to test the relation between the imitation skills (VMI subscale of PEP-3) and the developmental functioning, we decided to use another measure than the PEP-3 to estimate the level of developmental functioning. We thus used the Mullen Scale of Early Learning-MSEL [39], which was available for 133 out of the 177 children with ASD included in this study (this measure was indeed added at a later point in our cohort protocol and was thus missing for the data collected earlier).

The MSEL scale is developed for the assessment of typically developing children and consists of 5 domains with items organized according to developmental stages and their level of difficulty: gross motor (GM), visual reception (VR), fine motor (FM), receptive language (RL), and expressive language (EL). This assessment yields a global composite score (Early Learning Composite (ELC)) by adding the four cognitive subscales (VR, FM, RL, EL) and has a mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15. For the global developmental functioning in this study, we considered the standard composite score (ELC). For the measure of individual domains (receptive and expressive language), we used the measure of age equivalents (AE). We opted for the AE scores as the standard T scores of the MSEL subscales show poor sensitivity in the lower functioning end of the continuum (floor of 20), and an important number of our participants had this lowest score.

Statistical analyses

Between-group analyses (ASD vs TD)

Group comparison of imitation skills

To compare imitation skills at baseline between children with ASD (n = 177) and TD children (n = 43), we conducted a t-test using the raw scores obtained from the Visuo-Motor Imitation scale of PEP-3 [37].

Imitation trajectories over time

To compare trajectories of imitation skills over time between ASD and TD children, we used mixed model regression analysis applied on raw imitation scores including all available time points (total of 396 time points, N = 220, nASD = 177, nTD = 43). This model is particularly adapted for dealing with nested data, such as multiple time points, and has been applied in our previous studies involving a variable number of time points [31, 40,41,42,43]. This analysis estimates developmental trajectories by fitting random-slope models to the data, taking into account both within-subject and between-subject effects. Different models (constant, linear, quadratic, or cubic) were fitted using the nlmefit function in MATLAB R2011b (MathWorks) for each variable. A Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC)-based model selection method was then employed.

Within-group analyses (ASD group)

Relation of imitation to the symptom severity and developmental levels at baseline

To explore how an imitation deficit is related to difficulties in other areas of development, we used the cross-sectional data obtained from the ASD group for whom the Mullen Scale of Early Learning was available (n = 133, 113 males/20 females, age range 2.0–4.8 years old). The association of imitation with the level of autistic symptoms (CSS-ADOS), global cognitive functioning (the Early Learning Composite of MSEL), and more specifically, communication skills (age equivalents on Receptive and Expressive Language subscales of MSEL) was assessed using Spearman’s correlations. Results were considered significant at the level of p < .0125 (after applying the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons).

Imitation at baseline as a predictor of symptom severity and developmental levels

We then explored the predictive power of the early imitative skills at baseline on the evolution of autistic symptoms and developmental domains in our ASD group 1 year after the initial measurement. More specifically, we tested how the imitation predicted the symptoms and cognitive and communication skills 1 year after. For this purpose, we used Spearman partial correlations to assess the relation between imitation skills at baseline and subsequent score in symptoms of autism, cognitive, and communication levels a year later, while controlling for the baseline levels.

Imitation trajectories within the ASD group

Given the tremendous heterogeneity of the ASD phenotype [28], we wanted to better understand the diversity of imitation profiles and their evolution in the sample of children with ASD for whom we had longitudinal data (102 subjects). To this end, we used a K-means clustering method, which allows grouping together subjects similar throughout multiple dimensions (i.e., imitation skills at different ages) [44, 45]. We employed a two-step approach: First, to distinguish between children starting at different levels of imitation skills, we employed a K-means clustering on raw scores at the first time point. To obtain an optimal cluster number among several solutions (2–6 clusters), we used a silhouette approach [46]. Second, we applied a K-means clustering on the slopes of imitation skills by age in the subgroup of children with initially lower levels of imitation skills to test for divergent trajectories over time. Thus, our subgroup of children with imitation difficulties at baseline was further divided into two subgroups (one composed of children with initial imitation difficulties but who showed significant improvement over time, and the other subgroups included children who showed a stable profile of imitation difficulties over time). Furthermore, we wanted to understand if clinical characteristics were related to the distinct imitation trajectories in these two sub-samples that showed most difficulties in imitation at baseline. In particular, we tested the baseline differences between the two groups with regard to the level of autistic symptoms and cognitive and language skills. We also explored the extent to which these two subgroups could be distinguished by the type of intervention received, which could account for this difference in trajectory. The type of intervention was considered as a dichotomous variable as previously described in our group [33], either an intensive intervention based on the ESDM intervention [47] or treatments available in the community. Finally, we tested whether this difference in trajectories between our two subgroups could be explained in terms of social orientation at the baseline, which we measured using an eye-tracking task [29].


Between-group analyses (ASD vs TD)

Group comparison of imitation skills

Using a cross-sectional sample (N = 220, 177 children with ASD, 43 with TD, age range 2.0–5.0 years old), we were able to show that the two groups differed significantly in their imitation skills (U = 1270, p < 0.001). Indeed, children with ASD had markedly lower imitation skills than typically developing children (see Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Group comparison of imitation skills obtained from the Visuo-Motor Imitation scale of PEP-3 (raw scores)

Imitation trajectories over time

Using all available visits for our cross-sectional sample (total of 396 time points, N = 220, nASD = 177, nTD = 43), we tested the between-group differences in trajectories of imitation. As shown in Fig. 3, the group trajectories in imitation skills estimated using mixed-models were significantly different (group effect: p < .001; interaction: p < .001). The best fitted model was of the 2nd order, meaning that the relation of the imitation with age was quadratic. Indeed, the TD children showed good imitation skills at 2 years old with only a slight improvement thereafter. In contrast, at the group level, children with ASD present markedly low imitation skills at a young age with substantial improvement between the ages of 2 and 5 (see Fig. 3). However, we also observe that trajectories of children with ASD are very heterogeneous and this point is addressed in our later analyses.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Imitation trajectories over time in the ASD and TD groups. The trajectory on the group level (solid lines, red = ASD, blue = TD) is obtained using mixed-effect models [41, 42]. The 95% confidence interval of estimated group-level trajectory is represented in colored bands. Repeated time points of the same subjects are connected with dotted lines

Results within the ASD group

Relation of imitation with level of symptoms and developmental domains at baseline

Within our ASD group for whom the Mullen Scales of Early Learning was available (n = 133, 113 males/20 females, age range 2.0–4.8 years old), imitation skills were moderately negatively related to the level of symptoms (rs = − 0.583, p < .001), as the children who show the most of symptoms are also those with more imitation difficulties (see Fig. 4). In addition, imitation skills were strongly positively correlated with the composite score of cognitive skills at baseline, as well as communication skills (Receptive and Expressive Language) (ELC: rs = 0.671, p < .001; RL: rs= 0.778, p < .001, EL: rs= 0.738, p < .001), that is, children with lower imitation skills were also those with lower skills in these domains (see Fig. 5).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Spearman correlation between imitation and level of symptoms within the ASD group (Visuo-Motor Imitation scale of PEP-3 and Calibrated Severity Score of ADOS-G or 2)

Fig. 5
figure 5

Spearman correlations between baseline imitation skills (raw scores of Visuo-Motor Imitation scale of PEP-3) and a early learning composite of MSEL, b receptive language age equivalent scores, and c expressive language age equivalent scores

Imitation at baseline as a predictor of the autistic symptoms and developmental levels

Imitation skills at baseline were predictive of the level in communication skills (receptive and expressive language) a year later in our preschoolers with ASD (RL: rs = 0.372, p = .001, EL: rs = 0.412, p < .001). Indeed, children with better imitation skills at baseline showed a greater level in these domains a year later (see Fig. 6). This effect was the most evident in the domain of expressive language. Further correlations between imitation skills and the composite cognitive score or the level of symptoms did not survive after correction for multiple comparisons (considering a stringent significance level at p < .0125 using Bonferroni correction). In addition, we conducted supplementary analyses to test the relation between imitation at baseline and the gains in communication skills (see Fig. S1 in Supplementary Materials).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Spearman partial correlations between imitation skills at baseline (raw scores of the Visuo-Motor Imitation scale of PEP-3) and receptive language (a) and expressive language (b) 1 year later while controlling for the baseline levels in respective skills in the ASD group (in age equivalent scores of the Mullen Scale of Early Learning)

Imitation trajectories within the ASD group

The first step of K-means clustering on the baseline raw imitation scores yielded two optimal clusters (silhouette score of 0.828). The first cluster (subgroup) of ASD children (named ASD1, n = 46) (see Fig. 7) had less difficulties with imitation at baseline and followed a trajectory highly similar to the one seen in our TD group (Fig. 3) while the other cluster started significantly lower at baseline.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Imitation trajectories over time within the ASD group (n = 102). The trajectories at the group level (solid lines black = ASD1, nASD1 = 46, red = ASD2, nASD2 = 27, blue = ASD3, nASD3 = 29) are obtained using mixed-effect models [41, 42]. The 95% confidence interval of estimated group-level trajectory is represented in colored bands. Repeated time points of the same subjects are connected with dotted lines. The distribution in the subgroups was defined by the K-means clustering method in two steps. First clustering step yielded two clusters based on imitation skills raw scores at first time point. We retained the higher cluster (ASD1), and proceeded to the second clustering step performed on the slopes of imitation skills, yielding ASD2 and ASD3 subgroups

To better understand developmental trajectory in children who start lower on imitation skills, we then applied a second K-means clustering on the developmental slopes on imitation scores in our remaining group of ASD children. These children belonged to the cluster that showed less imitation skills at baseline (total - ASD1 = 56 participants). This second clustering step yielded the two groups which we denote ASD2 and ASD3 (nASD2 = 27, nASD3 = 29). The trajectories of the two clusters from the second clustering step were significantly different (see Fig. 7), one subgroup (ASD2) had a deficit on imitation skills at 2 years old, but showed a great improvement until 5 years old while the other subgroup in ASD children (ASD3) showed many difficulties in imitation at 2 years old and these difficulties continue over the time (group effect: p < .001; interaction: p < .001).

Finally, we wanted to understand which clinical characteristics were related to the distinct imitation trajectories in our sub-samples ASD2 and ASD3. In particular, we tested the baseline differences between the two groups (ASD2 and ASD3) with regard to the level of symptoms, cognitive and language skills, type of intervention, and social orientation measured with an eye-tracking task [29] (see Table S2 in Supplementary Materials). We found no significant baseline differences between the ASD2 and the ASD3 according to all tested clinical variables. However, by analyzing these two groups’ trajectories in terms of many other aspects (communication skills, cognitive skills, and adaptive behaviors), we observed that the subgroup ASD2 showed an overall improvement in all domains. This pattern might suggest that imitation improvement in this group indicates an overall enhancement rather than the specific link of imitation skills progress and a particular developmental measure. In line with this, and considering the results of our purely longitudinal analyses that highlighted predictive relation between the imitation skills at baseline and language a year later, we wanted to understand the language evolution across the 3 subgroups identified based on imitation trajectories. As shown in Fig. S2 in Supplementary Material, the three clusters that showed distinct imitation pattern indeed showed distinct language trajectories across childhood years. Specifically, we observed that imitation skills have a prominent role on the subsequent development of language skills, by which the children who had either better imitation skills at baseline (ASD1) or fast improvement in imitation skills (ASD2) were the ones showing the best language outcomes.


Our results corroborate previous findings on the imitative deficit in preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in comparison with typically developing children (TD) [1, 9, 13,14,15,16,17,18, 48]. Compared with our TD group, preschoolers with ASD showed significantly lower imitation skills as measured by the Visuo-Motor Imitation scale of the PEP-3 [37]. We then explored the trajectory of imitation skills over time, which is poorly documented in the literature until now [25]. Our results showed that TD children present good imitation skills, as measured with the PEP-3, already at the age of 2 years old, with only a slight improvement thereafter. In comparison, children with ASD presented a major imitative deficit at 2 years old, with a considerable gain up to 5 years old. We further confirmed that imitation skills in children with ASD at baseline were negatively related to the overall levels of symptoms while showing a positive relation with cognitive skills and language. We also showed that early imitation skills predicted the level in communication skills 1 year after. Finally, we were able to delineate three different imitation trajectories in our sample of children with ASD. A subgroup of children (ASD1) presented fewer difficulties in imitation at 2 years old. In contrast, others (ASD2) showed major deficits in imitation at 2 years old, followed by accelerated gains up to the age of 5. Lastly, we also identified a subgroup of children (ASD3) who had significant difficulties at baseline and showed less progress over the years.

Developmental trajectory of imitation in ASD and TD

Besides showing lower baseline imitative skills, we found that the acquisition of imitation skills in children with ASD did not follow the same trajectory as in TD children. In ASD children, we observed the steep progress between the age of 2 and 3.5 years, highlighting the importance of this early sensitive period for learning new skills [49,50,51,52,53]. While most TD children reach the ceiling on this measure around the age of 5 years, the ASD group showed a lower average skill level at this age. Previous studies have suggested that the imitation deficits in ASD are more specific than broad [54], concerning for example, more meaningless gestures than actions on the objects. Nevertheless, our results speak in favor of a more broad impairment as most of the actions measured by the imitation scale we used are rather simple one-step actions on objects and relatively few concern more abstract meaningless gestures. These difficulties in imitation of simple actions with objects can have deleterious effects on learning [9, 19,20,21]. Indeed, our results showed that imitation skills were related to composite cognitive skills and communication skills (receptive and expressive language) in toddlers with ASD. As proposed by several authors (e.g., [55]), a child with major imitative difficulties shows delay in the acquisition of new skills, especially because he/she does not use this channel to learn from her/his parents, siblings, and peers (e.g., [2, 3]).

In addition, confirming previous studies [14, 56, 57], our results showed a strong correlation between imitation skills and the level of symptoms measured by the ADOS-2 [36], whereby the children with more difficulties in imitation had also more symptoms of ASD at baseline. Thus, imitation skills were clinically informative of the severity of the level of autistic symptoms. This result corroborates findings claiming the importance of imitation in the acquisition of early tools of communication and its contribution to autistic symptoms [9,10,11, 21]. Indeed, difficulties of engagement in reciprocal imitation early on may greatly limit social learning opportunities, lower the experiences of sharing and joint attention, important for socio-communicative development [29]. Moreover, taking part in imitation activities prepares the first basis of communication turns. Thus, from the earliest moments, the reciprocal imitation of vocalizations and facial expressions in face-to-face interactions paves the way for the development of a more complex social interchange ([58], as cited by [9]).

Imitation as a predictor of developmental domains in children with ASD

While previous studies demonstrated that imitation predicts future cognitive skills [5,6,7, 59], the correlation that we observed in our sample did not hold after Bonferroni correction. The same was true for the relationship between imitation and level of autistic symptoms 1 year later. Nevertheless, the baseline imitation skills were predictive of communication development 1 year later. This was the most evident in the domain of expressive language, where better imitation skills at baseline were predictive of higher levels of expressive language a year later, while controlling for the baseline levels of expressive language. The link between imitation and language has already been explored in previous studies [11, 60,61,62]. Indeed, infants start by imitating vocalizations, exchanges of vocalizations, then later words and sentences (e.g., [63]). Some studies found that verbal imitation [64] but also body movement imitation [61] are predictors of expressive language development.

Although children with ASD at a group level showed important gains in imitation skills, between 2 and 5 years old, the early difficulties in this domain presented at the age of 2 could still have an important influence on learning later on. Imitation is important not only for children’s current achievements, but also for their future skills. Learning to imitate can then be considered as one of the primary goals in early intervention programs for children with ASD [47], which can then be used to build on this skill for future acquisitions.

Imitation trajectories within the ASD group

Given the important heterogeneity of the ASD phenotype [28], we explored the extent to which there might be different developmental trajectories of imitation within our sample of children with ASD. Although some authors have studied the trajectories of different types of imitation in children with ASD [65], to the best of our knowledge, no study to date tried to parse the heterogeneity of the early imitation development in ASD. Here, using a clustering approach, we observed three separate imitation trajectories in children with ASD. Similar to previous studies [7, 61, 62, 66], we found that good early imitation skills are linked to better outcomes, while early difficulties predict impairment in developmental domains. Nevertheless, our study showed that some children with ASD have major difficulties in imitation at 2 years old, but show a great improvement until 5 years of age. As mentioned previously, we were not able to find a characteristic that would differentiate these two groups at baseline and predict whether a child with imitation difficulties at baseline will follow one trajectory or the other. However, our results support that imitation improvement is an indicator of an overall enhancement, without a clear causal relationship with the used measures. More investigation should be done to understand the mechanisms through which a child’s development is set on one trajectory or the other. The absence of evidence for specific differences between the two groups with a divergent imitation trajectory is interpreted with caution. Indeed, imitation is often used to incite and encourage the child to do the exercises in assessments such as the one used in this study (MSEL [39];), specifically when there are difficulties of language comprehension, as it is frequently the case in young children with ASD [67]. Thus, a low score on domains of cognitive or language skills could, in some cases, be better explained by maladaptive behaviors than by real difficulties in these areas [33].

Perspectives and limitations

As a limitation to this study, we would like to emphasize that the imitation skills measured in the context of our study are elementary skills and concern mainly actions with objects. Thus, it would be particularly interesting to refine the analyses using a scale adapted for a larger age range, with a broader variety of activities, allowing differentiation of different imitation types as described by Vivanti and Hamilton [1].

There are many avenues to pursue to better understand the mechanisms underlying imitation in young children with ASD. Indeed, as discussed, it would be particularly interesting and valuable to find an early predictor of the developmental trajectory in children with early imitation difficulties. We showed that the children with an imitation deficit at 2 years will either maintain their difficulties in a rather global way in the years to come or show significant improvement in imitation but also in other areas in general. It would then be a question of finding which characteristics of the behavioral phenotype or the interventions received allowed the positive evolution in some cases. One of the avenues to follow in this sense could be to explore earlier milestones of imitation than one measured in our study. Indeed, imitation is very linked to other skills such as social orientation, joint attention, and social reciprocity as demonstrated by some authors [13, 14]. Despite our unsuccessful attempt to distinguish our two groups in terms of social orientation using an eye-tacking task [29], more investigations could be done in this sense with a younger sample.


Our study confirmed a delay in the acquisition of imitation skills in preschoolers with ASD who present a different developmental trajectory than children with typical development. We also showed that these difficulties are related to levels of autistic symptoms, developmental deficits, and long-term consequences on the development of communication and composite cognitive skills. Moreover, our analyses identified subgroups of children with ASD in terms of imitative development, reflecting the heterogeneity that characterizes this population. Thus, our study confirms the status of imitation as a prerequisite for the development of other skill areas and the importance of including its learning in early intervention programs, for example.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Autism spectrum disorders


Typical development


Autism Diagnosis Observation Schedule


PsychoEducational Profile, 3rd edition


Verbal and Preverbal Cognition


Expressive language


Receptive language


Visuo-Motor Imitation


Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, 2nd edition


Mullen Scale of Early Learning


Early Learning Composite


  1. Vivanti G, Hamilton A. Imitation in autism spectrum disorders. In: Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders, fourth edition: American Cancer Society; 2014.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Howe N, Rosciszewska J, Persram RJ. “I’m an ogre so I’m very hungry!” “I’m assistant ogre”: the social function of sibling imitation in early childhood. Infant Child Dev. 2018;27(1).

  3. Zmyj N, Seehagen S. The role of a model’s age for young children’s imitation: a research review. Infant Child Dev. 2013;22(6):622–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pfeifer JH, Iacoboni M, Mazziotta JC, Dapretto M. Mirroring others’ emotions relates to empathy and interpersonal competence in children. NeuroImage. 2008;39(4):2076–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hurley SL, Chater N. Perspectives on imitation: imitation, human development, and culture: MIT Press; 2005.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Strid K, Tjus T, Smith L, Meltzoff AN, Heimann M. Infant recall memory and communication predicts later cognitive development. Infant Behav Dev. 2006;29(4):545–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Vivanti G, Dissanayake C, Zierhut C, Rogers SJ, Victorian ASELCC Team. Brief report: predictors of outcomes in the Early Start Denver Model delivered in a group setting. J Autism Dev Disord. 2013;43(7):1717–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Uzgiris IC. Two functions of imitation during infancy. Int J Behav Dev. 1981;4(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ingersoll B. The social role of imitation in autism: implications for the treatment of imitation deficits. Infants Young Child. 2008;21(2):107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hanika L, Boyer W. Imitation and social communication in infants. Early Child Educ J. 2019;47(5):615–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Toth K, Munson J, Meltzoff AN, Dawson G. Early predictors of communication development in young children with autism spectrum disorder: joint attention, imitation, and toy play. J Autism Dev Disord. 2006;36(8):993–1005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®): American Psychiatric Pub; 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Girardot AM, De Martino S, Rey V, Poinso F. Étude des relations entre l’imitation, l’interaction sociale & l’attention conjointe chez les enfants autistes. Neuropsychiatr Enfance Adolesc. 2009;57(4):267–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McDuffie A, Turner L, Stone W, Yoder P, Wolery M, Ulman T. Developmental correlates of different types of motor imitation in young children with autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2007;37(3):401–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Plavnick JB, Hume KA. Observational learning by individuals with autism: a review of teaching strategies. Autism. 2014;18(4):458–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rogers SJ, Bennetto L, McEvoy R, Pennington BF. Imitation and pantomime in high-functioning adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Child Dev. 1996;67(5):2060–73.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Thurm A, Lord C, Lee L-C, Newschaffer C. Predictors of language acquisition in preschool children with autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2007;37(9):1721–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zwaigenbaum L, Bryson S, Rogers T, Roberts W, Brian J, Szatmari P. Behavioral manifestations of autism in the first year of life. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2005;23(2):143–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ingersoll B, Meyer K. Examination of correlates of different imitative functions in young children with autism spectrum disorders. Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2011;5(3):1078–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Poon KK, Watson LR, Baranek GT, Poe MD. To what extent do joint attention, imitation, and object play behaviors in infancy predict later communication and intellectual functioning in ASD? J Autism Dev Disord. 2012;42(6):1064–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Villalobos ME, Mizuno A, Dahl BC, Kemmotsu N, Müller R-A. Reduced functional connectivity between V1 and inferior frontal cortex associated with visuomotor performance in autism. NeuroImage. 2005;25(3):916–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dawson G, Rogers S, Munson J, Smith M, Winter J, Greenson J, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of an intervention for toddlers with autism: the Early Start Denver Model. Pediatrics. 2010;125(1):e17–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Delano ME. Video modeling interventions for individuals with autism. Remedial Spec Educ. 2007;28(1):33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Espanola Aguirre E, Gutierrez A. An assessment and instructional guide for motor and vocal imitation. J Autism Dev Disord. 2019;49(6):2545–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Young GS, Rogers SJ, Hutman T, Rozga A, Sigman M, Ozonoff S. Imitation from 12 to 24 months in autism and typical development: a longitudinal Rasch analysis. Dev Psychol. 2011;47(6):1565.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Rowberry J, Macari S, Chen G, Campbell D, Leventhal JM, Weitzman C, et al. Screening for autism spectrum disorders in 12-month-old high-risk siblings by parental report. J Autism Dev Disord. 2015;45(1):221–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Baranek GT, Watson LR, Crais E, Reznick S. First-year inventory (FYI). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wiggins LD, Robins DL, Adamson LB, Bakeman R, Henrich CC. Support for a dimensional view of autism spectrum disorders in toddlers. J Autism Dev Disord. 2012;42(2):191–200.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Franchini M, Glaser B, de Wilde HW, Gentaz E, Eliez S, Schaer M. Social orienting and joint attention in preschoolers with autism spectrum disorders. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0178859.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Franchini M, Wood de Wilde H, Glaser B, Gentaz E, Eliez S, Schaer M. Brief report: a preference for biological motion predicts a reduction in symptom severity 1 year later in preschoolers with autism spectrum disorders. Front Psychiatry. 2016;7.

  31. Franchini M, Zöller D, Gentaz E, Glaser B, Wood de Wilde H, Kojovic N, et al. Early adaptive functioning trajectories in preschoolers with autism spectrum disorders. J Pediatr Psychol. 2018;43(7):800–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kojovic N, Ben Hadid L, Franchini M, Schaer M. Sensory processing issues and their association with social difficulties in children with autism spectrum disorders. J Clin Med. 2019;8(10):1508.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Robain F, Franchini M, Kojovic N, Wood de Wilde H, Schaer M. Predictors of treatment outcome in preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder: an observational study in the greater Geneva area, Switzerland. J Autism Dev Disord. 2020.

  34. Sperdin HF, Coito A, Kojovic N, Rihs TA, Jan RK, Franchini M, et al. Early alterations of social brain networks in young children with autism. ELife. 2018;7:e31670.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Lord C, Risi S, Lambrecht L, Cook EH, Leventhal BL, DiLavore PC, et al. The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule—Generic: a standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2000;30(3):205–23.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lord C, Rutter M, DiLavore P, Risi S, Gotham K, Bishop S. Autism diagnostic observation schedule–2nd edition (ADOS-2). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Corporation; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Schopler E, Lansing MD, Reichler RJ, Marcus LM. PEP-3, Psychoeducational profile: Pro-Ed; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Gotham K, Pickles A, Lord C. Standardizing ADOS scores for a measure of severity in autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2009;39(5):693–705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mullen E. Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) manual. Circle Pines: American; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Maeder J, Schneider M, Bostelmann M, Debbané M, Glaser B, Menghetti S, et al. Developmental trajectories of executive functions in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. J Neurodev Disord. 2016;8(1):10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Mancini V, Sandini C, Padula MC, Zöller D, Schneider M, Schaer M, et al. Positive psychotic symptoms are associated with divergent developmental trajectories of hippocampal volume during late adolescence in patients with 22q11DS. Mol Psychiatry. 2019:1–16.

  42. Mutlu AK, Schneider M, Debbané M, Badoud D, Eliez S, Schaer M. Sex differences in thickness, and folding developments throughout the cortex. NeuroImage. 2013;82:200–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Schneider M, Schaer M, Mutlu AK, Menghetti S, Glaser B, Debbané M, et al. Clinical and cognitive risk factors for psychotic symptoms in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: a transversal and longitudinal approach. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014;23(6):425–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bair E. Semi-supervised clustering methods. WIREs Comput Stat. 2013;5(5):349–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Sandini C, Zöller D, Scariati E, Padula MC, Schneider M, Schaer M, et al. Development of structural covariance from childhood to adolescence: a longitudinal study in 22q11.2DS. Front Neurosci. 2018;12.

  46. Rousseeuw PJ. Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J Comput Appl Math. 1987;20:53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Rogers SJ, Dawson G. Early Start Denver Model for young children with autism. New York: Guilford; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Colombi C, Liebal K, Tomasello M, Young G, Warneken F, Rogers SJ. Examining correlates of cooperation in autism: imitation, joint attention, and understanding intentions. Autism. 2009;13(2):143–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Dawson G. Early behavioral intervention, brain plasticity, and the prevention of autism spectrum disorder. Dev Psychopathol. 2008;20(3):775–803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Guralnick MJ. Effectiveness of early intervention for vulnerable children: a developmental perspective. Am J Ment Retard. 1997;102(4):319–45<0319:EOEIFV>2.0.CO;2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Johnson MH, Munakata Y. Processes of change in brain and cognitive development. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005;9(3):152–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Lovaas OI. Behavioral treatment and normal educational and intellectual functioning in young autistic children. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1987;55(1):3–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Vivanti G, Dissanayake C, The Victorian ASELCC Team. Outcome for children receiving the Early Start Denver Model before and after 48 months. J Autism Dev Disord. 2016;46(7):2441–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Rogers SJ, Williams JHG. Imitation and the social mind: autism and typical development: Guilford Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Wadsworth HM, Maximo JO, Lemelman AR, Clayton K, Sivaraman S, Deshpande HD, et al. The Action Imitation network and motor imitation in children and adolescents with autism. Neuroscience. 2017;343:147–56.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Rogers SJ, Hepburn SL, Stackhouse T, Wehner E. Imitation performance in toddlers with autism and those with other developmental disorders. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2003;44(5):763–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Zachor DA, Ilanit T, Itzchak EB. Autism severity and motor abilities correlates of imitation situations in children with autism spectrum disorders. Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2010;4(3):438–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Trevarthen C, Kokkinaki T, Fiamenghi GA Jr. What infants’ imitations communicate: with mothers, with fathers and with peers. In: Imitation in infancy: Cambridge University Press; 1999. p. 127–85.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Rogers SJ, Pennington BF. A theoretical approach to the deficits in infantile autism. Dev Psychopathol. 1991;3(2):137–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Heimann M, Nordqvist E, Strid K, Almrot JC, Tjus T. Children with autism respond differently to spontaneous, elicited and deferred imitation. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2016;60(5):491–501.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Stone WL, Ousley OY, Littleford CD. Motor imitation in young children with autism: what’s the object? J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1997;25(6):475–85.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Stone WL, Yoder PJ. Predicting spoken language level in children with autism spectrum disorders. Autism. 2001;5(4):341–61.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Jones SS. Imitation in infancy: the development of mimicry. Psychol Sci. 2007;18(7):593–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Smith V, Mirenda P, Zaidman-Zait A. Predictors of expressive vocabulary growth in children with autism. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007;50(1):149–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Sanefuji W, Yamamoto T. The developmental trajectory of imitation in infants with autism spectrum disorders: a prospective study. Psychology. 2014;05(11):1313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Charman T, Baron-Cohen S, Swettenham J, Baird G, Drew A, Cox A. Predicting language outcome in infants with autism and pervasive developmental disorder. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2003;38(3):265–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Kwok EYL, Brown HM, Smyth RE, Oram Cardy J. Meta-analysis of receptive and expressive language skills in autism spectrum disorder. Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2015;9:202–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors are particularly grateful to all the families who participated in this study. Furthermore, the authors thank Lylia Ben Hadid, François Robain, Sonia Richetin, Sara Maglio, Aurélie Bochet, Michel Godel, Stefania Solazzo, Ornella Vico Begara, Chiara Usuelli, Eva Micol, Laura Sallin, Lisa Esposito, Kenza Latrèche, Oriane Grosvernier, and Constance Ferrat for their implication in data collection.


This research was funded by the National Center of Competence in Research “Synapsy” of the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF, grant number: 51AU40_125759) and by a SNF grant to M.S. (#163859). This work was also partially supported by the Foundation of the Geneva University Hospital ( and by the “Fondation Pôle Autisme” (

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Conceptualization, I.P., N.K. and M.S.; methodology, I.P., N.K., and M.S; validation, M.S.; formal analysis, I.P. and N.K.; resources, M.S.; data curation, I.P., N.K., M.F., and M.S.; writing—original draft preparation, I.P.; writing—review and editing, I.P., N.K, M.F., and M.S.; visualization, I.P. and N.K.; supervision, M.S.; project administration, M.S.; funding acquisition, M.S. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irène Pittet.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Geneva University Institutional Review Board approved this study. All families provided written informed consent to participate.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Supplementary Materials.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pittet, I., Kojovic, N., Franchini, M. et al. Trajectories of imitation skills in preschoolers with autism spectrum disorders. J Neurodevelop Disord 14, 2 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Autism spectrum disorders
  • Imitation
  • Developmental trajectories
  • Heterogeneity