Skip to main content

Sensory and motor secondary symptoms as indicators of brain vulnerability

Abstract

In addition to the primary symptoms that distinguish one disorder from the next, clinicians have identified, yet largely overlooked, another set of symptoms that appear across many disorders, termed secondary symptoms. In the emerging era of systems neuroscience, which highlights that many disorders share common deficits in global network features, the nonspecific nature of secondary symptoms should attract attention. Herein we provide a scholarly review of the literature on a subset of secondary symptoms––sensory and motor. We demonstrate that their pattern of appearance––across a wide range of psychopathologies, much before the full-blown disorder appears, and in healthy individuals who display a variety of negative symptoms––resembles the pattern of appearance of network abnormalities. We propose that sensory and motor secondary symptoms can be important indicators of underlying network aberrations and thus of vulnerable brain states putting individuals at risk for psychopathology following extreme circumstances.

Introduction

In the clinical literature, disorders are characterized mainly by their distinguishing symptoms and behaviors, often referred to as the primary symptoms. For example, autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is defined by difficulties in communication and restricted behavior, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) by attention deficits and schizophrenia by reality distortion. In addition to these primary symptoms that distinguish one disorder from the next, there is another set of symptoms that appear across many disorders, termed secondary symptoms or nonspecific signs. Secondary symptoms refers to subtle impairments in motor coordination, complex motor sequencing, sensory integration and regulation, sleep and feeding difficulties, as well as difficulties in self-regulation [1, 2]. Neurologists believe that secondary symptoms reflect nonlocalizable disturbances in connections between subcortical and cortical regions or among cortical regions [2]. Numerous publications have described the existence of these secondary symptoms in association with a variety of disorders. Yet, intriguingly, this body of work has been largely overlooked [3, 4], perhaps because of the nonspecific nature of these “low-level” symptoms and the difficulty in relating them to the specific high-level impairments of the different disorders.

Although signs that appear across disorders may not be informative for understanding specific disorders, they may be highly relevant to understanding general characteristics of the brain in psychopathological states [4]. Indeed, the recent emergence of systems neuroscience, a promising field that calls for a paradigm shift in the way we view healthy and psychopathological brain states, suggests that invariant characteristics observed across psychopathologies may provide important information. Unlike traditional approaches that have focused on uniquely distinguishing one disorder from the next, there is an attempt in systems neuroscience to unify a wide range of psychopathologies and describe their common characteristics. That is, this field highlights that many disorders share common deficits in global network features [5]. The main focus of systems neuroscience lies in characterizing the abnormal brain architecture that underlies many disorders and describing the resulting consequences for the dynamic function of the brain network and its ability to maintain functional homeostasis. Indeed, one of the major consequences of the abnor-malities in brain architecture, observed in many disorders, is the loss of robustness of the brain network to perturbations. This suggests that brains with abnormalities in brain architecture are more vulnerable and that unfavorable circumstances (for example, psychological life stressors, chemical stressors, brain hemorrhages or aberrations in anatomical brain structures during development or neurodegeneration) can cause them to deviate from homeostasis.

Herein we propose an integrative framework in which secondary symptoms represent the behavioral manifestations of the brain’s abnormal architecture and are thus indicators of network vulnerability. To that end, we provide a systematic review of sensory and motor secondary symptoms and show that although secondary symptoms and network aberrations come from different levels of description—one at the behavioral level and the other at the network level—they display similar patterns of occurrence. That is, sensory and motor symptoms and network aberrations not only occur across a wide range of psychopathologies but also are detectable much before the full-blown disorder appears, in both at-risk populations and in healthy individuals who display a variety of negative symptoms. We then provide theoretical and empirical support that the behavioral level and the network level may be related and propose that secondary symptoms can be important indicators of vulnerable brain states at risk to psychopathology. In other words, the appearance of secondary symptoms in an individual may indicate that his brain is in a less resilient state, and thus he has a higher probability of developing psychopathology following unfavorable circumstances. The novel integrative approach used here yields practical clinical benefits and advances our understanding of the developmental paths of psychopathologies.

Review

In this section, we review reports of sensory and motor secondary symptoms from a wide range of disciplines. We define sensory and motor symptoms broadly and focus on indications of abnormalities and difficulties observed in these processes. The primary purpose of this section is to reveal an underlying pattern of occurrence of these abnormalities in relation to psychopathology. Therefore, we investigated the occurrence of sensory and motor abnormalities during active states of psychopathology. In addition, we examined their occurrence before the psychopathology is evident, when there is a propensity to develop a psychopathology, and even in healthy, undiagnosed individuals at no apparent risk for psychopathology but with more negative symptoms than those found in the average healthy population.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review of the literature on studies that linked signs of sensory and motor abnormalities to a wide range of developmental, psychiatric and/or affective and neurodegenerative psychopathologies. We used search terms that are variations of words related to sensory and motor abnormalities (see Table 1). Since neurologists often term the co-occurrence of sensory and motor abnormalities neurological soft signs (NSSs) [2], we also included this term in our search. The search was conducted in the following databases: APA PsychNET (http://psycnet.apa.org/), MEDLINE, Academic Search Complete  (http://www.ebscohost.com/academic/acade-mic-search-complete), Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection (http://www.ebscohost.com/academic/psychology-behavioral-sciences-collection),  SocINDEX (http://www.ebscohost.com/academic/socindex-with-full-text) and Education Resource Information Center (ERIC; http://eric.ed.gov/). The psychopathologies included in this search were autism, ADHD, dyslexia, learning disabilities, language disorders, schizophrenia, anxiety, depression, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), bipolar affective disorder, borderline personality disorder, Alzheimer disease (AD) and traumatic brain injury. We also searched for words related to healthy aging. In order to account for differences in definitions across disciplines (for example, schizophrenia can be characterized as a psychiatric disorder or a developmental one [6]), we included general search terms such as “psychiatric,” “developmental” or “affective.” The specific search terms used in this review, as well as exclusion criteria, are displayed in Table 1.

Table 1 Search terms and exclusion criteria a

Criteria for exclusion

Only reports that compared the appearance of sensory and/or motor abnormalities observed in individuals with a psychopathology with that of healthy human controls were accepted into the review. Comorbidities (for example, ADHD together with developmental coordination disorder) were excluded. As mentioned, our goal was to present a pattern of appearance of secondary symptoms as reported by researchers and clinicians. Thus, we did not include reviews and meta-analyses. We also did not distinguish between research methodologies (questionnaires, retrospective studies, prospective studies and objective tests), as long as they presented quantifiable data that could determine whether or not a difference was observed between the psychopathology tested and healthy controls. Thus, single-case studies, qualitative studies and intervention studies were not included. In addition, most of the vast neurophysiological literature fell outside the scope of this review (for example, anatomical, sensory event–related potentials, imaging and electrophysiological studies). Additional exclusion criteria are presented in Table 1.

Division of included studies into four categories

The studies that were included in the review were divided into four categories: (1) irregularities across disorders: that is, studies demonstrating that sensory and/or motor abnormalities appear in a full-blown psychopathology (for example, sensory abnormalities in individuals with autism); (2) irregularities before primary symptoms: studies demonstrating that sensory and/or motor abnormalities are evident before the full-blown symptoms of a psychopathology appear (for example, a retrospective study showing that children with ADHD displayed motor abnormalities as infants or a prospective study of individuals at risk for schizophrenia who later developed the disorder) or studies of populations considered at risk for a disorder (for example, findings of sensory abnormalities in siblings of patients with autism); (3) irregularities in healthy individuals: studies which assessed rates of sensory and/or motor abnormalities in healthy populations not considered at risk for psychopathology (for example, healthy college students); (4) no difference: studies that indicated no sign of sensory and/or motor abnormalities in relation to psychopathology (for example, no difference between individuals with autism and healthy controls in sensory abnormalities). The fourth category was included to enable a balanced picture.

Results

Our search revealed more than 330 reports that mentioned sensory or motor irregularities or their combination (that is, NSSs) in relation to psychopathology or symptoms of psychopathology. Dividing them into our four categories revealed a clear pattern of appearance.

Irregularities across disorders

Two hundred thirty-two reports mentioning sensory or motor irregularities in individuals with psychopathology were found (see Table 2 for details). Although there was variability in the number of published reports relating sensory and/or motor irregularities to specific disorders (ranging from three papers implicating secondary symptoms in PTSD and fifty-two implicating them in autism), we found mentions of sensory and/or motor irregularities for each of the search terms. Only 22 reports found no clear differences between the rate of sensory and/or motor signs in individuals with a psychopathological condition and healthy people (see right column in Table 2).

Table 2 Sensory and/or motor irregularities appear across disorders a

Irregularities before primary symptoms

Our search revealed 60 retrospective, prospective and sibling and/or family studies indicating that abnormalities in sensory and motor processes are evident before psychopathology appears and before the full-blown symptoms are visible (see Table 3 for details). Such findings suggest that these irregularities not only are correlated with the disorders but may have a predictive nature as well [3, 229, 230].

Table 3 Sensory and/or motor irregularities appear long before the full-blown symptoms a

For example, various sensory and motor difficulties precede communication delay and autism symptoms in most infants who later develop ASD [9, 58, 232] or who are at risk for developing autism [231]. In toddlers at risk for familial dyslexia, researchers found a relationship between motor development at infanthood and the level of language skills at toddlerhood [238]. In a prospective study following 401 toddlers, motor performance was found to be predictive of ADHD [237]. In another study comprising 275 children with ADHD, their siblings and controls, the unaffected siblings displayed intermediate levels of motor problems between the ADHD-affected children and the control subjects [100].

Quite a few studies have reported the existence of sensory and motor signs much sooner than schizophrenia symptoms were evident. For example, a few prospective studies [240242] found that children who developed schizophrenia as adults took longer to achieve motor milestones and scored significantly worse than controls on motor coordination tasks. Significantly more NSSs were found in children and relatives with a higher genetic risk for schizophrenia [248, 276] and in those who later became adult schizophrenics [242]. Moreover, relatives of patients with schizophrenia exhibited levels of NSSs that were intermediate between patients with the full-blown disorder and healthy controls [163166].

Early motor signs were also predictive of later mood-related psychopathologies. For example, in a large cohort study of 6,850 children, boys with poor motor skills at age 7 years had more than three times the odds of having maternally rated anxiety at the ages of 11 and 16 years [270]. Another study found that both OCD patients and their unaffected first-degree relatives displayed more motor coordination signs than healthy controls [184]. In several prospective epidemiological studies, an association was found between NSSs and the development of anxiety, depression and obsessive-compulsive symptoms over time [267, 268]. Interestingly, recent studies on twins have found that NSSs represent vulnerability to PTSD. Not only did combat veterans with PTSD have significantly more NSSs than combat veterans without PTSD, but their unexposed co-twins had significantly more NSSs than the unexposed co-twins of the veterans without PTSD [129, 277].

Irregularities in healthy individuals

Although researchers rarely examine signs of psychopathology in healthy individuals, our search succeeded in revealing 17 studies that reported the occurrence of sensory and motor abnormalities in healthy individuals. Interestingly, in all of these reports, negative mental symptoms related to psychopathology (for example, higher anxiety and depression levels) were found to correlate with higher rates of sensory and/or motor abnormalities (see Table 4). That healthy individuals with more sensory and motor abnormalities than average also tend to have more negative mental health symptoms suggests that these abnormalities are not the consequence of psychopathology, but rather a characteristic of an underlying vulnerability to it.

Table 4 Sensory and/or motor irregularities are associated with negative symptoms in healthy individuals

For example, healthy individuals with extreme sensory reactivity are more likely to display signs of anxiety and depression [278281, 287, 296]. Individuals with extreme sensory reactivity patterns also display higher signs of alexithymia and autistic characteristics [287, 289], social phobia [290] and avoidant and borderline personality traits [291, 292]. Preschoolers and school-aged children with sensory regulation dysfunction (for example, sensory overresponsivity) were more likely to display early and co-occurring internalizing and externalizing behaviors, lower levels of concurrent adaptive social behaviors and more psychiatric symptoms [293, 294]. Similarly, preschoolers with motor coordination difficulties exhibited negative emotional symptoms, such as signs of depression and anxiety [282, 288]. This was also shown in a twin study, which found significantly higher levels of anxious and depressive symptomatology in twins with motor abnormalities compared with control twins with no motor difficulties. Moreover, in twins discordant for motor abnormalities, the twin with motor difficulties exhibited more anxious and depressive signs than the co-twin without such difficulties [283].

Summary

Our systematic review revealed a clear pattern of the appearance of sensory and motor irregularities across developmental, affective and/or psychiatric and degenerative brain psychopathologies. These irregularities not only appear together with the full-blown disorder but also are apparent much before its primary signs, even in individuals who are considered healthy. Although clinicians have long noted the nonspecific nature of sensory and motor signs in relation to many disorders, to the best of our knowledge, this review is the first scholarly demonstration of their pattern of appearance. Notably, other irregularities included within the group of secondary symptoms––such as self-regulation and eating and sleeping difficulties––have also been associated with a wide range of disorders. Although a systematic review of these symptoms is still lacking, they seem to follow a similar pattern (see [4] for examples). Taken together, the facts that secondary symptoms are widespread and that they are even associated with the extreme end of the healthy subclinical spectrum indicate a need for a reexamination of their possible contribution to understanding the pathways to psychopathology. Next, we suggest that the nonspecific nature of these secondary symptoms, which may have led to their being overlooked by clinicians and researchers, may actually be an advantage in the eyes of the emerging field of systems neuroscience.

Explaining the pattern of occurrence of sensory and motor secondary symptoms within a systems neuroscience framework

Outlining the systems neuroscience framework

Driven by methodological advances concerned with the study and analysis of complex networks in the brain, the exciting new field of systems neuroscience offers a novel perspective on ways to examine the brain, both in health and in psychopathology [5, 297]. Systems neuroscientists use graph theoretical tools to assess various network metrics1[1] from a large body of functional and structural connectivity data obtained from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG) studies. The network metrics obtained from these data allow for the examination of normal and psychopathological brain states within a framework of global network structures (see, [5], for example), thereby indicating the efficiency of information transfer across the whole network and the ability of large-scale networks within the brain to switch between engaged and disengaged modes of function.

For example, converging evidence indicates that healthy brains are characterized by small-world architecture [298, 299], which describes a configuration in which most nodes are not neighbors, but can be reached from every other node by a small number of steps. Such an architecture enables a balance between local and global structural characteristics and thus an optimal balance between segregation and integration, which is essential for high synchronicity and fast information transmission in a complex network [300].

Furthermore, it is believed that the construction of brain networks (as well as most biological networks) in small-world architecture may reflect an evolutionary advantage. One possibility is that small-world networks are more robust to perturbations than other network architectures [301, 302]. This robustness is supported by global network mechanisms [302] that limit the effects of potentially disruptive perturbations [301304]. For example, the high modularity and degeneracy characteristics of small-world networks enables the insulation of subsystems that are functionally connected to each other from spreading perturbations (due to high modularity) and supports functional homeostasis even in the face of large structural variation in structure (due to the existence of many degenerate pathways) [305]. The inhibitory connections spread throughout the network play an important role in maintaining dynamic balance, whereas self-organizing regulatory mechanisms support functional homeostasis [306]. All of these network mechanisms maintain the remarkable capacity of the brain to withstand a wide range of perturbations in the course of injury and disease [302]. Thus, abnormalities in network metrics can result in general network failure, which affects network robustness as well as efficient information transfer, and can cause deficits in the access, engagement and disengagement of large-scale networks supporting cognition and behavior [302, 307].

Aberrations in network metrics follow a similar pattern of occurrence

Using network analytical methods, researchers who have conducted empirical and theoretical studies have found that aberrations in various network metrics are a telltale sign of significant global deficits in brain organization [5] and that psychopathology is related to dysfunctional brain organization [302, 308]. Convergent anatomical and functional evidence from a wide range of methodologies and from many different psychopathological states indicates that the disruption of global network connectivity, as indicated by abnormalities in various network metrics, is associated with disturbances in cognition and behavior as well as with signs of psychopathology [309312].

A range of neurodevelopmental disorders have already been described in terms of aberrant network measures. In an EEG study comparing children with autism to healthy controls, children with autism showed a loss of small-world architecture, characterized by a significantly increased path length and reduced clustering [313, 314]. Similar findings were also demonstrated for high-functioning adults with autism and for those with Asperger syndrome [315, 316]. Another neurodevelopmental disorder that has been studied using a network approach is ADHD. Using resting-state fMRI data, several studies have revealed alterations in small-world architecture, characterized by increased local network efficiencies and decreases in global network efficiencies, in both children and adults with ADHD [317319].

Schizophrenia, a psychiatric disorder that is considered to be neurodevelopmental in origin [6], has also been studied extensively using network analytical tools [320322]. For example, a comparison of structural data from schizophrenia patients and healthy controls indicated a loss of small-world architecture as measured by a significantly lower clustering coefficient, longer characteristic path length and dysfunctional central hubs [320, 323].

Abnormalities in network metrics were also reported for affective disorders as well as for neurodegenerative disorders and aging. For example, aberrant small-world architecture was found for drug-naïve, first-episode major depression patients [324] and for patients with OCD [325]. Abnormalities in network metrics were also reported when functional connectivity data from patients with AD [326329], dementia [330] and traumatic brain injury [331] were compared to those from controls. Interestingly, aberrations in network metrics were also observed in healthy elders compared to healthy younger adults [332, 333]. Taken together, these studies suggest that network aberrations are a general characteristic of psychopathologies without regard to the causes leading to the psychopathology.

Perhaps even more interesting is the fact that disruptions in network metrics seem to occur even before the full-blown disorder is evident [334337]. This is most obvious in AD and schizophrenia, which have been studied extensively in this respect. For example, Yao et al.[334] measured network parameters in patients with AD, individuals with mild cognitive impairments (MCIs) and healthy age-matched controls. The longest absolute path length and the greatest clustering coefficient were found in patients with AD, which indicates that the small-world organization of the cortical network was the least optimal in AD. The small-world measures of the MCI network exhibited intermediate values between AD and the normal aging controls. Given that MCI is a transitional stage between normal aging and AD [334], these findings, as well as those reported in other studies [338341], suggest that network aberrations are evident in at-risk individuals much before the full-blown AD symptoms appear [334].

With regard to schizophrenia, Dazzan et al.[342] obtained MRI data from 102 individuals considered to be at a very high risk for schizophrenia and followed them for one year. Those who developed schizophrenia or other forms of psychosis had more volumetric abnormalities in distributed brain areas at the time of the MRI scan than those who did not develop a form of psychosis. That risk for schizophrenia is associated with aberrant brain architecture is further supported by additional studies indicating pervasive brain anatomical abnormalities in individuals at high risk for schizophrenia [343, 344], even as early as neonatal stages [345]. Shi et al. found that neonates at genetic risk for schizophrenia tended to have more aberrant metrics––such as globally lower efficiency and longer connection distance––than healthy controls, which indicates a less optimal small-world structures [345].

Further support that network aberrations predate the onset of a psychopathology is provided by studies demonstrating that healthy individuals with autistic traits [346] and healthy individuals with familial risk for ADHD [347] display more network abnormalities compared to healthy individuals with no risk for psychopathology. Dennis et al. [348] showed that structural brain networks of healthy individuals (measured with DTI) carrying one of the known autism risk genes (CNTNAP2) exhibited altered structural connectivity that was reflected in aberrant path length, small-world structure and global efficiency as compared to non-at-risk individuals.

To summarize, similarly to the case of the secondary symptoms reviewed above, network aberrations seem to accompany many brain pathologies and appear in at-risk individuals even before a psychopathology is diagnosed. Furthermore, they seem to be predictive in nature. As mentioned above, abnormalities in global network metrics are related to the loss of the network’s robustness and to an increase in vulnerability. In the next section, we suggest that secondary symptoms are linked to network aberrations and thus to brain vulnerability.

Secondary symptoms as indicators of network vulnerability

Central to the framework developed herein is the observation that although sensory and/or motor secondary symptoms and network aberrations come from different levels of description—one at the behavioral level and the other at the network level—they display similar patterns of occurrence. They are both found across psychopathologies, before psychopathology emerges, and seem to have some predictive capability. Both theoretical and empirical evidence suggests that they may indeed be related.

On a theoretical level, the relation between secondary symptoms and network aberrations can be supported by a deeper understanding of the consequences of the loss of small-world architecture and abnormalities in network metrics. As mentioned above, small-world architecture enables greater robustness to perturbations, as well as more efficient information transfer and integration throughout the network. Moreover, the architecture of small-world networks gives rise to global network mechanisms that ensure the maintenance of dynamic balance. Thus, network failure leads not only to less robustness to perturbations but also to less efficient information transfer throughout the network, as well as to the disruption of mechanisms in charge of maintaining dynamic balance [302]. As a result, network failure should affect general network function, including the most basic input, output and regulation processes [302]. Thus, irregularities in sensory, motor and regulatory processes can be viewed as arising together with the loss of robustness due to network failure. In other words, the same network abnormalities that lead to loss of robustness can also lead to abnormalities in basic processes (that is, secondary symptoms).

Empirically, this proposed relation between secondary symptoms and network aberrations is supported by a recent set of experiments demonstrating that sensory and motor secondary symptoms are associated with structural brain irregularities. Dazzan et al. investigated NSSs in 43 healthy individuals using high-resolution MRI and voxel-based methods of image analysis [349]. They found that higher rates of NSSs were associated with a reduction in the size of the inferior frontal gyrus, the middle and superior temporal gyrus, and the anterior cingulate gyrus. Several other works have recently found a strong association between the occurrence of NSSs in patients with schizophrenia and structural abnormalities in subcortical brain morphology [350354]; cerebello-thalamo-prefrontal networks [355]; the corpus callosum [356]; and prefrontal, temporal and cerebellar structures [356358]. Signs of sensory integration deficits have been associated with volume reduction in the cerebral cortex, including the precentral, superior and middle temporal, and lingual gyri [354]. In a longitudinal study, Kong et al. [359] investigated the cerebral correlates of persisting NSSs in first-episode patients with schizophrenia. They found that patients with a greater number of persistent neurological signs not only showed a less favorable outcome after one year (although differences did not reach significance) but also had significantly more structural abnormalities, which indicated a larger number of progressive cerebral changes. Taken together, these observations suggest that sensory and/or motor abnormalities represent clinical indicators of perturbed connectivity that underlies psychopathology [349, 353, 354, 360, 361].

Thus, network theory suggests that loss of network robustness can arise together with irregularities in basic processes due to global network failure [302]. In addition, structural evidence suggests that sensory and/or motor abnormalities represent clinical indicators of abnormalities in brain architecture [349361]. We thus suggest a novel integration between clinical observations and systems neuroscience that can explain the similarities between the patterns of occurrence of sensory and/or motor abnormalities and network aberrations. Within this framework, we propose that sensory and motor secondary symptoms reflect irregularities in basic processes arising because of network irregularities and are therefore indicators of vulnerable brain networks. In other words, they are a behavioral marker for a brain that is already in a psychopathological state or has the potential to develop a psychopathology under certain conditions.

The last part of our proposition suggests that prevalent appearance of secondary symptoms has a predictive nature. Thus, it can serve as a marker for individuals in whom psychopathology is not evident but has the potential to evolve. This is supported by many levels of evidence that we have referred to in this review, namely, the following: (1) that sensory and/or motor abnormalities appear in healthy individuals who are considered at risk for psychopathology (Table 3), (2) that sensory and/or motor abnormalities appear in healthy individuals not considered at risk for psychopathology but who display more negative symptoms than the average healthy population (Table 4), (3) that higher rates of NSSs in healthy people are associated with structural abnormalities [349] and (4) that healthy people at risk for psychopathology display network abnormalities.

Discussion

In this review, we emphasize the underlying pattern of occurrence of abnormalities in sensory and motor processes that seem to appear during states of psychopathology, before the psychopathology is evident and when there is a propensity to develop a psychopathology. Furthermore, our review demonstrates that even in healthy, undiagnosed individuals at no apparent risk for psychopathology, deviations from the norm in basic processes are correlated with more negative symptoms than those found in the average healthy population.

In addition, we show that abnormalities in network metrics associated with psychopathology exhibit a pattern of occurrence similar to that of secondary symptoms. We offer a novel integration between clinical observations and systems neuroscience to try to gain an understanding of the meaning of this pattern. This synthesis yielded a proposition that abnormalities in sensory and motor processes can be indications of a vulnerable brain (that is, a brain that has a higher probability of developing psychopathology following extreme circumstances).

Importantly, herein we focus only on a subset of possible secondary symptoms (sensory and/or motor). Although a similar systematic review of other secondary symptoms, such as sleeping, eating and self-regulation abnormalities, is lacking, a nonsystematic review that has been performed suggests that their pattern of appearance in relation to psychopathology resembles that of the sensory and/or motor secondary symptoms [4]. This similarity in patterns suggests that there are other indicators of brain vulnerability in addition to the sensory and/or motor symptoms reviewed herein.

The framework outlined herein supports the emerging theoretical approach that calls for a paradigm shift in the way psychopathologies are viewed, diagnosed and treated [35]. According to this approach, the current trend—in which syndromes are compartmentalized and viewed as exclusive and separable from each other and in which emphasis is placed on finding early markers that will predict specific disorders—is misguided [3]. The fact that many symptoms are shared across psychopathologies [3, 5] and that disorders often appear together suggests that many disorders (for example, ASD and ADHD) are actually representations of different aspects of the same underlying abnormality (for example, aberrations in global networks) [3, 362]. Thus, symptoms that appear across disorders “should be considered markers for the (very likely) presence of a neurodevelopmental disorder that (very likely) will continue to cause symptoms long after their clinical surfacing” [3]. In accordance with this recent approach, our framework suggests that secondary symptoms, such as sensory and/or motor abnormalities, represent an underlying potential (due to network vulnerability) to develop psychopathology. The prevalence and severity of secondary symptoms may indicate the level of this vulnerability [363].

Whether this potential to develop psychopathology will be realized and how it will be expressed depend both on the “level of vulnerability” of the underlying network and on the existence, nature and timing of a trigger that can shift the system from healthy to psychopathological function. For example, a trigger can be the abnormal anatomical or synaptic changes that occur during powerful developmental or degenerative processes. Extreme circumstances can also serve as triggers (for example, stressful life adversities, chemical stressors or brain hemorrhages). Indeed, the interaction between developmental aberrations and external stressors is exemplified in schizophrenia. Growing evidence indicates that schizophrenia is a developmental disorder (see, for example, [6]). However, it usually erupts only during the stressful period of late adolescence and early adulthood, when young adults leave their parents’ home and become independent [364]. The integrative framework presented herein emphasizes the need to better understand the interaction between the prevalence and severity of secondary signs, as well as the timing and nature of perturbations that can trigger the development of a psychopathology.

Several important clinical implications, relating to both early detection and intervention, arise from this framework. This review gathers an extensive body of supportive evidence showing that the appearance of nonspecific secondary symptoms, as well as nonspecific metric aberrations, precedes the development of specific psychopathologies. Early detection of vulnerability may therefore contribute to efforts directed at finding early markers of psychopathology [3, 4]. Further research is needed to directly assess the clinical usefulness of secondary symptoms as predictors of psychopathology.

Regarding implications for interventions, it is possible that, once secondary symptoms are detected, an intervention could reduce vulnerability and prevent or curtail the development of psychopathology. Interestingly, preliminary evidence suggests that interventions targeting basic processes associated with secondary symptoms (for example, sensory, motor or sleep) seem to alleviate vulnerability in preterm infants and in individuals already diagnosed with a psychopathology (see, for example, [365370]). These clinical implications suggest that, when viewed within the framework presented herein, secondary symptoms can provide important information that can guide clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Conclusion

The intent of this review is to attract attention to the nonspecific characteristics of psychopathologies and to demonstrate that, within the systems neuroscience framework, these characteristics may hold important information that can advance the theoretical and clinical understanding of psychopathologies. The direct evidence for a relation between behavioral secondary symptoms and network aberrations and vulnerability, as well as its clinical usefulness, is limited and requires substantial research. We hope the integrative framework outlined herein will stimulate work that aims to increase understanding of this relation further and to advance our understanding of the common mechanisms underlying disorders and how they can be used for prevention, diagnosis and treatment of disorders.

Endnote

1Network metrics include measures of local connectivity levels (such as the clustering and modularity of various nodes in the network), measures of global integration (such as the average path length between two nodes, which is indicative of how efficiently the network is connected) and measures of the importance of specific hub nodes (such as the centrality of specific nodes). Another example of a network metric is how much the brain adheres to a global network architecture, called a “small world network,” that reflects high clustering, a short path length and the formation of densely connected hubs [298].

Abbreviations

AD:

Alzheimer disease

ADHD:

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

ASD:

Autism spectrum disorder

DTI:

Diffusion tensor imaging

EEG:

Electroencephalography

fMRI:

Functional magnetic resonance imaging

MCI:

Mild cognitive impairments

MEG:

Magnetoencephalography

NSS:

Neurological soft sign

OCD:

Obsessive-compulsive disorder

PTSD:

Posttraumatic stress disorder.

References

  1. DeGangi GA, Breinbauer C, Roosevelt JD, Porges S, Greenspan S: Prediction of childhood problems at three years in children experiencing disorders of regulation during infancy. Infant Ment Health J. 2000, 21: 156-175. 10.1002/1097-0355(200007)21:3<156::AID-IMHJ2>3.0.CO;2-D.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chan RCK, Wang Y, Wang L, Chen EYH, Manschreck TC, Li ZJ, Yu X, Gong QY: Neurological soft signs and their relationships to neurocognitive functions: a re-visit with the structural equation modeling design. PLoS One. 2009, 4: e8469-10.1371/journal.pone.0008469.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gillberg C: The ESSENCE in child psychiatry: Early Symptomatic Syndromes Eliciting Neurodevelopmental Clinical Examinations. Res Dev Disabil. 2010, 31: 1543-1551. 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.06.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Levit-Binnun N, Golland Y: Finding behavioral and network indicators of brain vulnerability. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012, 6: 10-

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Menon V: Large-scale brain networks and psychopathology: a unifying triple network model. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011, 15: 483-506. 10.1016/j.tics.2011.08.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gilmore JH: Understanding what causes schizophrenia: a developmental perspective. Am J Psychiatry. 2010, 167: 8-10. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09111588.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Adamson A, O’Hare A, Graham C: Impairments in sensory modulation in children with autistic spectrum disorder. Br J Occup Ther. 2006, 69: 357-364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Adrien JL, Ornitz E, Barthelemy C, Sauvage D, Lelord G: The presence or absence of certain behaviors associated with infantile autism in severely retarded autistic and nonautistic retarded children and very young normal children. J Autism Dev Disord. 1987, 17: 407-416. 10.1007/BF01487069.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Baranek GT: Autism during infancy: a retrospective video analysis of sensory-motor and social behaviors at 9–12 months of age. J Autism Dev Disord. 1999, 29: 213-224. 10.1023/A:1023080005650.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Baranek GT, Boyd BA, Poe MD, David FJ, Watson LR: Hyperresponsive sensory patterns in young children with autism, developmental delay, and typical development. Am J Ment Retard. 2007, 112: 233-245. 10.1352/0895-8017(2007)112[233:HSPIYC]2.0.CO;2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Baranek GT, David FJ, Poe MD, Stone WL, Watson LR: Sensory Experiences Questionnaire: discriminating sensory features in young children with autism, developmental delays, and typical development. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006, 47: 591-601. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01546.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Baranek GT, Watson LR, Boyd BA, Poe MD, David FJ, McGuire L: Hyporesponsiveness to social and nonsocial sensory stimuli in children with autism, children with developmental delays, and typically developing children. Dev Psychopathol. 2013, 25: 307-320. 10.1017/S0954579412001071.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ben-Sasson A, Cermak SA, Orsmond GI, Tager-Flusberg H, Carter AS, Kadlec MB, Dunn W: Extreme sensory modulation behaviors in toddlers with autism spectrum disorders. Am J Occup Ther. 2007, 61: 584-592. 10.5014/ajot.61.5.584.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Blakemore SJ, Tavassoli T, Calò S, Thomas RM, Catmur C, Frith U, Haggard P: Tactile sensitivity in Asperger syndrome. Brain Cogn. 2006, 61: 5-13. 10.1016/j.bandc.2005.12.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Blanche EI, Reinoso G, Chang MC, Bodison S: Proprioceptive processing difficulties among children with autism spectrum disorders and developmental disabilities. Am J Occup Ther. 2012, 66: 621-624. 10.5014/ajot.2012.004234.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cascio C, McGlone F, Folger S, Tannan V, Baranek G, Pelphrey KA, Essick G: Tactile perception in adults with autism: a multidimensional psychophysical study. J Autism Dev Disord. 2008, 38: 127-137. 10.1007/s10803-007-0370-8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Crane L, Goddard L, Pring L: Sensory processing in adults with autism spectrum disorders. Autism. 2009, 13: 215-228. 10.1177/1362361309103794.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dickie VA, Baranek GT, Schultz B, Watson LR, McComish CS: Parent reports of sensory experiences of preschool children with and without autism: a qualitative study. Am J Occup Ther. 2009, 63: 172-181. 10.5014/ajot.63.2.172.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dunn W, Myles BS, Orr S: Sensory processing issues associated with Asperger syndrome: a preliminary investigation. Am J Occup Ther. 2002, 56: 97-102. 10.5014/ajot.56.1.97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hilton CL, Harper JD, Kueker RH, Lang AR, Abbacchi AM, Todorov A, LaVesser PD: Sensory responsiveness as a predictor of social severity in children with high functioning autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2010, 40: 937-945. 10.1007/s10803-010-0944-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hochhauser M, Engel-Yeger B: Sensory processing abilities and their relation to participation in leisure activities among children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder (HFASD). Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2010, 4: 746-754. 10.1016/j.rasd.2010.01.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kern JK, Garver CR, Carmody T, Andrews AA, Mehta JA, Trivedi MH: Examining sensory modulation in individuals with autism as compared to community controls. Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2008, 2: 85-94. 10.1016/j.rasd.2007.03.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kern JK, Garver CR, Carmody T, Andrews AA, Trivedi MH, Mehta JA: Examining sensory quadrants in autism. Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2007, 1: 185-193. 10.1016/j.rasd.2006.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kern JK, Garver CR, Grannemann BD, Trivedi MH, Carmody T, Andrews AA, Mehta JA: Response to vestibular sensory events in autism. Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2007, 1: 67-74. 10.1016/j.rasd.2006.07.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kern JK, Trivedi MH, Garver CR, Grannemann BD, Andrews AA, Savla JS, Johnson DG, Mehta JA, Schroeder JL: The pattern of sensory processing abnormalities in autism. Autism. 2006, 10: 480-494. 10.1177/1362361306066564.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kern JK, Trivedi MH, Grannemann BD, Garver CR, Johnson DG, Andrews AA, Savla JS, Mehta JA, Schroeder JL: Sensory correlations in autism. Autism. 2007, 11: 123-134. 10.1177/1362361307075702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Khalfa S, Bruneau N, Rogé B, Georgieff N, Veuillet E, Adrien JL, Barthélémy C, Collet L: Increased perception of loudness in autism. Hear Res. 2004, 198: 87-92. 10.1016/j.heares.2004.07.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kientz MA, Dunn W: A comparison of the performance of children with and without autism on the Sensory Profile. Am J Occup Ther. 1997, 51: 530-537. 10.5014/ajot.51.7.530.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kwakye LD, Foss-Feig JH, Cascio CJ, Stone WL, Wallace MT: Altered auditory and multisensory temporal processing in autism spectrum disorders. Front Integr Neurosci. 2011, 4: 129-

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Leekam SR, Nieto C, Libby SJ, Wing L, Gould J: Describing the sensory abnormalities of children and adults with autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2007, 37: 894-910. 10.1007/s10803-006-0218-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. O’Brien J, Tsermentseli S, Cummins O, Happé F, Heaton P, Spencer J: Discriminating children with autism from children with learning difficulties with an adaptation of the Short Sensory Profile. Early Child Dev Care. 2009, 179: 383-394. 10.1080/03004430701567926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Reynolds S, Lane SJ, Thacker L: Sensory processing, physiological stress, and sleep behaviors in children with and without autism spectrum disorders. OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2012, 32: 246-257.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rogers SJ, Hepburn S, Wehner E: Parent reports of sensory symptoms in toddlers with autism and those with other developmental disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2003, 33: 631-642.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Siaperas P, Ring HA, McAllister CJ, Henderson S, Barnett A, Watson P, Holland AJ: Atypical movement performance and sensory integration in Asperger’s syndrome. J Autism Dev Disord. 2012, 42: 718-725. 10.1007/s10803-011-1301-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tavassoli T, Baron-Cohen S: Taste identification in adults with autism spectrum conditions. J Autism Dev Disord. 2012, 42: 1419-1424. 10.1007/s10803-011-1377-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tomchek SD, Dunn W: Sensory processing in children with and without autism: a comparative study using the Short Sensory Profile. Am J Occup Ther. 2007, 61: 190-200. 10.5014/ajot.61.2.190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Watling RL, Deitz J, White O: Comparison of Sensory Profile scores of young children with and without autism spectrum disorders. Am J Occup Ther. 2001, 55: 416-423. 10.5014/ajot.55.4.416.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Woodard CR, Goodwin MS, Zelazo PR, Aube D, Scrimgeour M, Ostholthoff T, Brickley M: A comparison of autonomic, behavioral, and parent-report measures of sensory sensitivity in young children with autism. Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2012, 6: 1234-1246. 10.1016/j.rasd.2012.03.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Weimer AK, Schatz AM, Lincoln A, Ballantyne AO, Trauner DA: “Motor” impairment in Asperger syndrome: evidence for a deficit in proprioception. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2001, 22: 92-101. 10.1097/00004703-200104000-00002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Cheung PPP, Siu AMH: A comparison of patterns of sensory processing in children with and without developmental disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2009, 30: 1468-1480. 10.1016/j.ridd.2009.07.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Reynolds S, Bendixen RM, Lawrence T, Lane SJ: A pilot study examining activity participation, sensory responsiveness, and competence in children with high functioning autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2011, 41: 1496-1506. 10.1007/s10803-010-1173-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Fuentes CT, Mostofsky SH, Bastian AJ: No proprioceptive deficits in autism despite movement-related sensory and execution impairments. J Autism Dev Disord. 2011, 41: 1352-1361. 10.1007/s10803-010-1161-1.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Güçlü B, Tanidir C, Mukaddes NM, Ünal F: Tactile sensitivity of normal and autistic children. Somatosens Mot Res. 2007, 24: 21-33. 10.1080/08990220601179418.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Jones CRG, Happé F, Baird G, Simonoff E, Marsden AJS, Tregay J, Phillips RJ, Goswami U, Thomson JM, Charman T: Auditory discrimination and auditory sensory behaviours in autism spectrum disorders. Neuropsychologia. 2009, 47: 2850-2858. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.06.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Tavassoli T, Baron-Cohen S: Olfactory detection thresholds and adaptation in adults with autism spectrum condition. J Autism Dev Disord. 2012, 42: 905-909. 10.1007/s10803-011-1321-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Lopata C, Hamm EM, Volker MA, Sowinski JE: Motor and visuomotor skills of children with Asperger’s disorder: preliminary findings. Percept Mot Skills. 2007, 104: 1183-1192.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Pan CY, Tsai CL, Chu CH: Fundamental movement skills in children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2009, 39: 1694-1705. 10.1007/s10803-009-0813-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Papadopoulos N, McGinley J, Tonge B, Bradshaw J, Saunders K, Murphy A, Rinehart N: Motor proficiency and emotional/behavioural disturbance in autism and Asperger’s disorder: another piece of the neurological puzzle?. Autism. 2012, 16: 627-640. 10.1177/1362361311418692.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sahlander C, Mattsson M, Bejerot S: Motor function in adults with Asperger’s disorder: a comparative study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2008, 24: 73-81. 10.1080/15368370701380843.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Travers B, Powell P, Klinger L, Klinger M: Motor difficulties in autism spectrum disorder: linking symptom severity and postural stability. J Autism Dev Disord. 2013, 43: 1568-1583. 10.1007/s10803-012-1702-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Whyatt CP, Craig CM: Motor skills in children aged 7–10 years, diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2012, 42: 1799-1809. 10.1007/s10803-011-1421-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Dewrang P, Sandberg AD: Parental retrospective assessment of development and behavior in Asperger syndrome during the first 2 years of life. Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2010, 4: 461-473. 10.1016/j.rasd.2009.11.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Esposito G, Venuti P: Analysis of toddlers’ gait after six months of independent walking to identify autism: a preliminary study. Percept Mot Skills. 2008, 106: 259-269. 10.2466/pms.106.1.259-269.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Freitag CM, Kleser C, Schneider M, von Gontard A: Quantitative assessment of neuromotor function in adolescents with high functioning autism and Asperger syndrome. J Autism Dev Disord. 2007, 37: 948-959. 10.1007/s10803-006-0235-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Gernsbacher MA, Sauer EA, Geye HM, Schweigert EK, Goldsmith HH: Infant and toddler oral- and manual-motor skills predict later speech fluency in autism. J Child Psychology Psychiatr. 2008, 49: 43-50. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01820.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Hilton C, Wente L, LaVesser P, Ito M, Reed C, Herzberg G: Relationship between motor skill impairment and severity in children with Asperger syndrome. Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2007, 1: 339-349. 10.1016/j.rasd.2006.12.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Hilton CL, Zhang Y, Whilte MR, Klohr CL, Constantino J: Motor impairment in sibling pairs concordant and discordant for autism spectrum disorders. Autism. 2012, 16: 430-441. 10.1177/1362361311423018.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Ozonoff S, Young GS, Goldring S, Greiss-Hess L, Herrera AM, Steele J, Macari S, Hepburn S, Rogers SJ: Gross motor development, movement abnormalities, and early identification of autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2008, 38: 644-656. 10.1007/s10803-007-0430-0.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. De Jong M, Punt M, De Groot E, Minderaa RB, Hadders-Algra M: Minor neurological dysfunction in children with autism spectrum disorder. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011, 53: 641-646. 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.03971.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Jansiewicz EM, Goldberg MC, Newschaffer CJ, Denckla MB, Landa R, Mostofsky SH: Motor signs distinguish children with high functioning autism and Asperger’s syndrome from controls. J Autism Dev Disord. 2006, 36: 613-621. 10.1007/s10803-006-0109-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Jones V, Prior M: Motor imitation abilities and neurological signs in autistic children. J Autism Dev Disord. 1985, 15: 37-46. 10.1007/BF01837897.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Tani P, Lindberg N, Appelberg B, Nieminen-von Wendt T, von Wendt L, Porkka-Heiskanen T: Clinical neurological abnormalities in young adults with Asperger syndrome. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2006, 60: 253-255. 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2006.01494.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Taal MN, Rietman AB, Meulen SVD, Schipper M, Dejonckere PH: Children with specific language impairment show difficulties in sensory modulation. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2013, 38: 70-78. 10.3109/14015439.2012.687760.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Finlay JCS, McPhillips M: Comorbid motor deficits in a clinical sample of children with specific language impairment. Res Dev Disabil. 2013, 34: 2533-2542. 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.05.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Owen SE, McKinlay IA: Motor difficulties in children with developmental disorders of speech and language. Child Care Health Dev. 1997, 23: 315-325. 10.1046/j.1365-2214.1997.864864.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Zelaznik HN, Goffman L: Generalized motor abilities and timing behavior in children with specific language impairment. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010, 53: 383-393. 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0204).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Chuang YC, Hsu CY, Chiu NC, Lin SP, Tzang RF, Yang CC: Other impairment associated with developmental language delay in preschool-aged children. J Child Neurol. 2011, 26: 714-717. 10.1177/0883073810389331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Müürsepp I, Ereline J, Gapeyeva H, Pääsuke M: Motor performance in 5-year-old preschool children with developmental speech and language disorders. Acta Paediatr. 2009, 98: 1334-1338. 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01294.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Fraser J, Goswami U, Conti-Ramsden G: Dyslexia and specific language impairment: the role of phonology and auditory processing. Sci Stud Read. 2010, 14: 8-29. 10.1080/10888430903242068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Georgiou GK, Papadopoulos TC, Zarouna E, Parrila R: Are auditory and visual processing deficits related to developmental dyslexia?. Dyslexia. 2012, 18: 110-129. 10.1002/dys.1439.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Heiervang E, Stevenson J, Hugdahl K: Auditory processing in children with dyslexia. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2002, 43: 931-938. 10.1111/1469-7610.00097.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. White S, Frith U, Milne E, Rosen S, Swettenham J, Ramus F: A double dissociation between sensorimotor impairments and reading disability: a comparison of autistic and dyslexic children. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2006, 23: 748-761. 10.1080/02643290500438607.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Wright CM, Conlon EG: Auditory and visual processing in children with dyslexia. Dev Neuropsychol. 2009, 34: 330-355. 10.1080/87565640902801882.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Polatajko HJ: A critical look at vestibular dysfunction in learning-disabled children. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1985, 27: 283-292.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. White S, Milne E, Rosen S, Hansen P, Swettenham J, Frith U, Ramus F: The role of sensorimotor impairments in dyslexia: a multiple case study of dyslexic children. Dev Sci. 2006, 9: 237-255. 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00483.x. 265–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Brookes RL, Tinkler S, Nicolson RI, Fawcett AJ: Striking the right balance: motor difficulties in children and adults with dyslexia. Dyslexia. 2010, 16: 358-373. 10.1002/dys.420.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Cinelli B, DePaepe JL: Dynamic balance of learning disabled and nondisabled children. Percept Mot Skills. 1984, 58: 243-245. 10.2466/pms.1984.58.1.243.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Kinnealey M: Tactile functions in learning-disabled and normal children: reliability and validity considerations. Occup Ther J Res. 1989, 9: 3-15.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Needle JL, Fawcett AJ, Nicolson RI: Balance and dyslexia: an investigation of adults’ abilities. Eur J Cogn Psychol. 2006, 18: 909-936. 10.1080/09541440500412304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Getchell N, Pabreja P, Neeld K, Carrio V: Comparing children with and without dyslexia on the Movement Assessment Battery for Children and the Test of Gross Motor Development. Percept Mot Skills. 2007, 105: 207-214.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Nicolson RI, Fawcett AJ: Comparison of deficits in cognitive and motor skills among children with dyslexia. Ann Dyslexia. 1994, 44: 147-164. 10.1007/BF02648159.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Bruininks VL, Bruininks RH: Motor proficiency of learning disabled and nondisabled students. Percept Mot Skills. 1977, 44: 1131-1137. 10.2466/pms.1977.44.3c.1131.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Cermak SA, Trimble H, Coryell J, Drake C: Bilateral motor coordination in adolescents with and without learning disabilities. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 1990, 10: 5-18. 10.1080/J006v10n01_02.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Durand M: Is there a fine motor skill deficit in nonverbal learning disabilities?. Educ Child Psychol. 2005, 22: 90-99.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Haslum MN, Miles TR: Motor performance and dyslexia in a national cohort of 10-year-old children. Dyslexia. 2007, 13: 257-275. 10.1002/dys.350.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Maloy CF, Sattler JM: Motor and cognitive proficiency of learning disabled and normal children. J Sch Psychol. 1979, 17: 213-218. 10.1016/0022-4405(79)90002-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Pieters S, Desoete A, Roeyers H, Vanderswalmen R, Van Waelvelde H: Behind mathematical learning disabilities: What about visual perception and motor skills?. Learn Individ Differ. 2012, 22: 498-504. 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.03.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Vuijk PJ, Hartman E, Mombarg R, Scherder E, Visscher C: Associations between academic and motor performance in a heterogeneous sample of children with learning disabilities. J Learn Disabil. 2011, 44: 276-282. 10.1177/0022219410378446.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Westendorp M, Hartman E, Houwen S, Smith J, Visscher C: The relationship between gross motor skills and academic achievement in children with learning disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2011, 32: 2773-2779. 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.05.032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. McPhillips M, Sheehy N: Prevalence of persistent primary reflexes and motor problems in children with reading difficulties. Dyslexia. 2004, 10: 316-338. 10.1002/dys.282.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Trauner D, Wulfeck B, Tallal P, Hesselink J: Neurological and MRI profiles of children with developmental language impairment. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000, 42: 470-475. 10.1017/S0012162200000876.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Bröring T, Rommelse N, Sergeant J, Scherder E: Sex differences in tactile defensiveness in children with ADHD and their siblings. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008, 50: 129-133. 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.02024.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Dunn W, Bennett D: Patterns of sensory processing in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2002, 22: 4-15.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Engel-Yeger B, Ziv-On D: The relationship between sensory processing difficulties and leisure activity preference of children with different types of ADHD. Res Dev Disabil. 2011, 32: 1154-1162. 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.01.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Lufi D, Tzischinsky O: The relationships between sensory modulation and sleep among adolescents with ADHD. J Atten Disord. 2012, 10.1177/1087054712457036

    Google Scholar 

  96. Romanos M, Renner TJ, Schecklmann M, Hummel B, Roos M, von Mering C, Pauli P, Reichmann H, Warnke A, Gerlach M: Improved odor sensitivity in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2008, 64: 938-940. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.08.013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Miller LJ, Nielsen DM, Schoen SA: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and sensory modulation disorder: a comparison of behavior and physiology. Res Dev Disabil. 2012, 33: 804-818. 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.12.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Gomez R, Condon M: Central auditory processing ability in children with ADHD with and without learning disabilities. J Learn Dis. 1999, 32: 150-158. 10.1177/002221949903200205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Schlee G, Neubert T, Worenz A, Milani TL: Children with ADHD show no deficits in plantar foot sensitivity and static balance compared to healthy controls. Res Dev Disabil. 2012, 33: 1957-1963. 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.05.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Fliers E, Vermeulen S, Rijsdijk F, Altink M, Buschgens C, Rommelse N, Faraone S, Sergeant J, Buitelaar J, Franke B: ADHD and poor motor performance from a family genetic perspective. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009, 48: 25-34. 10.1097/CHI.0b013e31818b1ca2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Flapper BC, Houwen S, Schoemaker MM: Fine motor skills and effects of methylphenidate in children with attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder and developmental coordination disorder. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006, 48: 165-169. 10.1017/S0012162206000375.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Chan RCK, McAlonan GM, Yang B, Lin L, Shum D, Manschreck TC: Prevalence of neurological soft signs and their neuropsychological correlates in typically developing Chinese children and Chinese children with ADHD. Dev Neuropsychol. 2010, 35: 698-711. 10.1080/87565641.2010.508552.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Fliers EA, de Hoog MLA, Franke B, Faraone SV, Rommelse NNJ, Buitelaar JK, der Sanden MWN-v: Actual motor performance and self-perceived motor competence in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder compared with healthy siblings and peers. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2010, 31: 35-40. 10.1097/DBP.0b013e3181c7227e.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Goulardins JB, Marques JCB, Casella EB, Nascimento RO, Oliveira JA: Motor profile of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, combined type. Res Dev Disabil. 2013, 34: 40-45. 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.07.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Harvey W, Reid G, Grizenko N, Mbekou V, Ter-Stepanian M, Joober R: Fundamental movement skills and children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: peer comparisons and stimulant effects. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2007, 35: 871-882. 10.1007/s10802-007-9140-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Klotz JM, Johnson MD, Wu SW, Isaacs KM, Gilbert DL: Relationship between reaction time variability and motor skill development in ADHD. Child Neuropsychol. 2012, 18: 576-585. 10.1080/09297049.2011.625356.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Karatekin C, Markiewicz SW, Siegel MA: A preliminary study of motor problems in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Percept Mot Skills. 2003, 97: 1267-1280.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Klimkeit EI, Sheppard DM, Lee P, Bradshaw JL: Bimanual coordination deficits in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2004, 26: 999-1010. 10.1080/13803390490515568.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Meyer A, Sagvolden T: Fine motor skills in South African children with symptoms of ADHD: influence of subtype, gender, age, and hand dominance. Behav Brain Funct. 2006, 2: 33-10.1186/1744-9081-2-33.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Okuda PM, Pinheiro FH, Germano GD, Padula NA, Lourencetti MD, Santos LC, Capellini SA: Fine motor, sensory and perceptive function of students with attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity [in English and Portuguese]. J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2011, 23: 351-357. 10.1590/S2179-64912011000400010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Piek JP, Pitcher TM, Hay DA: Motor coordination and kinaesthesis in boys with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1999, 41: 159-165. 10.1017/S0012162299000341.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Rommelse NNJ, Altink ME, Oosterlaan J, Buschgens CJM, Buitelaar J, De Sonneville LMJ, Sergeant JA: Motor control in children with ADHD and non-affected siblings: deficits most pronounced using the left hand. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007, 48: 1071-1079. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01781.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Slaats-Willemse D, de Sonneville L, Swaab-Barneveld H, Buitelaar J: Motor flexibility problems as a marker for genetic susceptibility to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2005, 58: 233-238. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.03.046.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Kooistra L, Crawford S, Dewey D, Cantell M, Kaplan BJ: Motor correlates of ADHD: contribution of reading disability and oppositional defiant disorder. J Learn Disabil. 2005, 38: 195-206. 10.1177/00222194050380030201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Lee IC, Chen YJ, Tsai CL: Kinematic performance of fine motor control in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: the effects of comorbid developmental coordination disorder and core symptoms. Pediatr Int. 2013, 55: 24-29. 10.1111/ped.12010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Polderman TJC, van Dongen J, Boomsma DI: The relation between ADHD symptoms and fine motor control: a genetic study. Child Neuropsychol. 2011, 17: 138-150. 10.1080/09297049.2010.518142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Dickstein DP, Garvey M, Pradella AG, Greenstein DK, Sharp WS, Castellanos FX, Pine DS, Leibenluft E: Neurologic examination abnormalities in children with bipolar disorder or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2005, 58: 517-524. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.12.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Ferrin M, Vance A: Examination of neurological subtle signs in ADHD as a clinical tool for the diagnosis and their relationship to spatial working memory. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012, 53: 390-400. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02496.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Kristensen H, Torgersen S: The association between avoidant personality traits and motor impairment in a population-based sample of 11–12-year-old children. J Pers Disord. 2007, 21: 87-97. 10.1521/pedi.2007.21.1.87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Skirbekk B, Hansen BH, Oerbeck B, Wentzel-Larsen T, Kristensen H: Motor impairment in children with anxiety disorders. Psychiatry Res. 2012, 198: 135-139. 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.12.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Ekornås B, Lundervold AJ, Tjus T, Heimann M: Anxiety disorders in 8–11-year-old children: motor skill performance and self-perception of competence. Scand J Psychol. 2010, 51: 271-277. 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00763.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Jacob RG, Redfern MS, Furman JM: Space and motion discomfort and abnormal balance control in patients with anxiety disorders. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009, 80: 74-78. 10.1136/jnnp.2007.136432.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Erez O, Gordon CR, Sever J, Sadeh A, Mintz M: Balance dysfunction in childhood anxiety: findings and theoretical approach. J Anxiety Disord. 2004, 18: 341-356. 10.1016/S0887-6185(02)00291-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Farrow CV, Coulthard H: Relationships between sensory sensitivity, anxiety and selective eating in children. Appetite. 2012, 58: 842-846. 10.1016/j.appet.2012.01.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Hofmann SG, Bitran S: Sensory-processing sensitivity in social anxiety disorder: relationship to harm avoidance and diagnostic subtypes. J Anxiety Disord. 2007, 21: 944-954. 10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.12.003.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Hollander E, Weiller F, Cohen L, Kwon JH, DeCaria CM, Liebowitz MR, Stein DJ: Neurological soft signs in social phobia. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol. 1996, 9: 182-185.

    Google Scholar 

  127. Gurvits TV, Gilbertson MW, Lasko NB, Tarhan AS, Simeon D, Macklin ML, Orr SP, Pitman RK: Neurologic soft signs in chronic posttraumatic stress disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000, 57: 181-186. 10.1001/archpsyc.57.2.181.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Gurvits TV, Lasko NB, Schachter SC, Kuhne AA, Orr SP, Pitman RK: Neurological status of Vietnam veterans with chronic posttraumatic stress disorder. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1993, 5: 183-188.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Gurvits TV, Metzger LJ, Lasko NB, Cannistraro PA, Tarhan AS, Gilbertson MW, Orr SP, Charbonneau AM, Wedig MM, Pitman RK: Subtle neurologic compromise as a vulnerability factor for combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder: results of a twin study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006, 63: 571-576. 10.1001/archpsyc.63.5.571.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Gurvits TV, Carson MA, Metzger L, Croteau HB, Lasko NB, Orr SP, Pitman RK: Absence of selected neurological soft signs in Vietnam nurse veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2002, 110: 81-85. 10.1016/S0165-1781(02)00026-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Günther W, Günther R, Streck P, Römig H, Rödel A: Psychomotor disturbances in psychiatric patients as a possible basis for new attempts at differential diagnosis and therapy. III. Cross validation study on depressed patients: the psychotic motor syndrome as a possible state marker for endogenous depression. Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci. 1988, 237: 65-73. 10.1007/BF00382369.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Lohr JB, May T, Caligiuri MP: Quantitative assessment of motor abnormalities in untreated patients with major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord. 2013, 146: 84-90. 10.1016/j.jad.2012.08.043.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Schwartz F, Carr A, Munich RL, Bartuch E, Lesser B, Rescigno D, Viegener B: Voluntary motor performance in psychotic disorders: a replication study. Psychol Rep. 1990, 66: 1223-1234.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Zhao Q, Ma YT, Lui SS, Liu WH, Xu T, Yu X, Tan SP, Wang ZR, Qu M, Wang Y, Huang J, Cheung EF, Dazzan P, Chan RC: Neurological soft signs discriminate schizophrenia from major depression but not bipolar disorder. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2013, 43: 72-78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Boks MPM, Liddle PF, Burgerhof JGM, Knegtering R, van den Bosch RJ: Neurological soft signs discriminating mood disorders from first episode schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2004, 110: 29-35. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2004.00298.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Manschreck TC, Ames D: Neurologic features and psychopathology in schizophrenic disorders. Biol Psychiatry. 1984, 19: 703-719.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Lohr JB, Caligiuri MP: Abnormalities in motor physiology in bipolar disorder. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2006, 18: 342-349. 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.18.3.342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Swiecicki L, Zatorski P, Bzinkowska D, Sienkiewicz-Jarosz H, Szyndler J, Scinska A: Gustatory and olfactory function in patients with unipolar and bipolar depression. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2009, 33: 827-834. 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2009.03.030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. Negash A, Kebede D, Alem A, Melaku Z, Deyessa N, Shibire T, Fekadu A, Fekadu D, Jacobsson L, Kullgren G: Neurological soft signs in bipolar I disorder patients. J Affect Disord. 2004, 80: 221-230. 10.1016/S0165-0327(03)00116-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Rosenthal MZ, Ahn R, Geiger PJ: Reactivity to sensations in borderline personality disorder: a preliminary study. J Pers Disord. 2011, 25: 715-721. 10.1521/pedi.2011.25.5.715.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Brown S, Shankar R, Smith K: Borderline personality disorder and sensory processing impairment. Prog Neurol Psychiatry. 2009, 13: 10-16. 10.1002/pnp.127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. Pavony MT, Lenzenweger MF: Somatosensory processing and borderline personality disorder features: a signal detection analysis of proprioception and exteroceptive sensitivity. J Pers Disord. 2013, 27: 208-221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Swirsky-Sacchetti T, Gorton G, Samuel S, Sobel R, Genetta-Wadley A, Burleigh B: Neuropsychological function in borderline personality disorder. J Clin Psychol. 1993, 49: 385-396. 10.1002/1097-4679(199305)49:3<385::AID-JCLP2270490313>3.0.CO;2-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. De la Fuente JM, Bengoetxea E, Navarro F, Bobes J, Alarcón RD: Interconnection between biological abnormalities in borderline personality disorder: use of the Bayesian networks model. Psychiatry Res. 2011, 186: 315-319. 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.08.027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. De la Fuente JM, Bobes J, Vizuete C, Bascaran MT, Morlán I, Mendlewicz J: Neurologic soft signs in borderline personality disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006, 67: 541-546. 10.4088/JCP.v67n0404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Gardner DL, Lucas PB, Cowdry RW: Soft sign neurological abnormalities in borderline personality disorder and normal control subjects. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1987, 175: 177-180. 10.1097/00005053-198703000-00009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Brown C, Cromwell RL, Filion D, Dunn W, Tollefson N: Sensory processing in schizophrenia: missing and avoiding information. Schizophr Res. 2002, 55: 187-195. 10.1016/S0920-9964(01)00255-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. Cheng J, Han DY, Yao GZ, Wang Y, Wang YF: Balance function in schizophrenia patients. Chin Ment Health J. 2012, 26: 267-271.

    Google Scholar 

  149. Colbert EG, Koelgler RR, Markham CH: Vestibular dysfunction in childhood schizophrenia. AMA Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1959, 1: 600-617. 10.1001/archpsyc.1959.03590060062006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. Emmerich DS, Levine FM: Differences in auditory sensitivity of chronic schizophrenic patients and normal controls determined by use of a forced-choice procedure. Dis Nerv Syst. 1970, 31: 552-557.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  151. Ghadirian AM, Butter HJ: Sensory perception and motoric reactivity in schizophrenic patients. J Clin Psychol. 1978, 34: 629-633. 10.1002/1097-4679(197807)34:3<629::AID-JCLP2270340309>3.0.CO;2-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. Kent JS, Hong SL, Bolbecker AR, Klaunig MJ, Forsyth JK, O’Donnell BF, Hetrick WP: Motor deficits in schizophrenia quantified by nonlinear analysis of postural sway. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e41808-10.1371/journal.pone.0041808.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. Kiss I, Fábián A, Benedek G, Kéri S: When doors of perception open: visual contrast sensitivity in never-medicated, first-episode schizophrenia. J Abnorm Psychol. 2010, 119: 586-593.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. Levine FM, Whitney N: Absolute auditory threshold and threshold of unpleasantness of chronic schizophrenic patients and normal controls. J Abnorm Psychol. 1970, 75: 74-77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. Myers S, Caldwell D, Purcell G: Vestibular dysfunction in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 1973, 7: 255-261.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  156. Ramage EM, Weintraub DM, Allen DN, Snyder JS: Evidence for stimulus-general impairments on auditory stream segregation tasks in schizophrenia. J Psychiatr Res. 2012, 46: 1540-1545. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.08.028.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. Levy DL, Holzman PS, Proctor LR: Vestibular responses in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1978, 35: 972-981. 10.1001/archpsyc.1978.01770320066005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  158. Günther W, Günther R, Eich FX, Eben E: Psychomotor disturbances in psychiatric patients as a possible basis for new attempts at differential diagnosis and therapy. II. Cross validation study on schizophrenic patients: persistence of a “psychotic motor syndrome” as possible evidence of an independent biological marker syndrome for schizophrenia. Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci. 1986, 235: 301-308. 10.1007/BF00515918.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  159. Midorikawa A, Hashimoto R, Noguchi H, Saitoh O, Kunugi H, Nakamura K: Impairment of motor dexterity in schizophrenia assessed by a novel finger movement test. Psychiatry Res. 2008, 159: 281-289. 10.1016/j.psychres.2007.04.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  160. Sullivan EV, Shear PK, Zipursky RB, Sagar HJ, Pfefferbaum A: A deficit profile of executive, memory, and motor functions in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 1994, 36: 641-653. 10.1016/0006-3223(94)91173-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. Tabarés-Seisdedos R, Salazar-Fraile J, Selva-Vera G, Balanzá-Martínez V, Ballester-Sánchez F, Cózar-Santiago R, Leal-Cercós C, Gómez-Beneyto M: Abnormal motor asymmetry only during bimanual movements in schizophrenic patients compared with healthy subjects. Schizophr Res. 2003, 61: 245-253. 10.1016/S0920-9964(02)00286-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  162. Martin P, Tewesmeier M, Albers M, Schmid GB, Scharfetter C: Towards an understanding of sensory soft signs in schizophrenia. Psychopathology. 1995, 28: 281-284. 10.1159/000284939.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  163. Compton MT, Bollini AM, McKenzie Mack L, Kryda AD, Rutland J, Weiss PS, Bercu Z, Esterberg ML, Walker EF: Neurological soft signs and minor physical anomalies in patients with schizophrenia and related disorders, their first-degree biological relatives, and non-psychiatric controls. Schizophr Res. 2007, 94: 64-73. 10.1016/j.schres.2007.04.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  164. Mechri A, Bourdel MC, Slama H, Gourion D, Gaha L, Krebs MO: Neurological soft signs in patients with schizophrenia and their unaffected siblings: frequency and correlates in two ethnic and socioeconomic distinct populations. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2009, 259: 218-226. 10.1007/s00406-008-0859-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  165. Chen YLR, Chen YHE, Mak FL: Soft neurological signs in schizophrenic patients and their nonpsychotic siblings. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2000, 188: 84-89. 10.1097/00005053-200002000-00004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  166. Yazici AH, Demir B, Yazici KM, Göğüş A: Neurological soft signs in schizophrenic patients and their nonpsychotic siblings. Schizophr Res. 2002, 58: 241-246. 10.1016/S0920-9964(01)00338-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  167. Aksoy-Poyraz C, Poyraz BÇ, Turan Ş, Arıkan MK: Minor physical anomalies and neurological soft signs in patients with schizophrenia and their siblings. Psychiatry Res. 2011, 190: 85-90. 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.04.023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  168. Aydemir C, Goka E, Kisa C, Kurt A, Yuksel FV: Dyskinesia and soft neurological signs in schizophrenia: a comparative study. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2005, 9: 238-243. 10.1080/13651500500329150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  169. Chan RCK, Chen EYH: Neurological abnormalities in Chinese schizophrenic patients. Behav Neurol. 2007, 18: 171-181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  170. Flyckt L, Sydow O, Bjerkenstedt L, Edman G, Rydin E, Wiesel FA: Neurological signs and psychomotor performance in patients with schizophrenia, their relatives and healthy controls. Psychiatry Res. 1999, 86: 113-129. 10.1016/S0165-1781(99)00027-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  171. Ismail B, Cantor-Graae E, McNeil TF: Neurological abnormalities in schizophrenic patients and their siblings. Am J Psychiatry. 1998, 155: 84-89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  172. Jaafari N, Baup N, Bourdel MC, Olié JP, Rotge JY, Wassouf I, Sharov I, Millet B, Krebs MO: Neurological soft signs in OCD patients with early age at onset, versus patients with schizophrenia and healthy subjects. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2011, 23: 409-416.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  173. Le Seac’h A, Picard H, Gorsane MA, Vidal PP, Amado I, Krebs MO: A step toward an objective quantification of subtle neurological signs in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 2012, 198: 230-234. 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.12.039.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  174. Mohr F, Hubmann W, Cohen R, Bender W, Haslacher C, Hönicke S, Schlenker R, Wahlheim C, Werther P: Neurological soft signs in schizophrenia: assessment and correlates. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1996, 246: 240-248. 10.1007/BF02190275.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  175. Sevincok L, Akoglu A, Topaloglu B, Aslantas H: Neurological soft signs in schizophrenic patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2004, 58: 274-279. 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2004.01231.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  176. Shibre T, Kebede D, Alem A, Kebreab S, Melaku Z, Deyassa N, Negash A, Fekadu A, Fekadu D, Medhin G, Negeri C, Jacobsson L, Kullgren G: Neurological soft signs (NSS) in 200 treatment-naïve cases with schizophrenia: a community-based study in a rural setting. Nord J Psychiatry. 2002, 56: 425-431. 10.1080/08039480260389343.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  177. Venkatasubramanian G, Latha V, Gangadhar BN, Janakiramaiah N, Subbakrishna DK, Jayakumar PN, Keshavan MS: Neurological soft signs in never-treated schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2003, 108: 144-146. 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2003.00113.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  178. Walker E, Green M: Soft signs of neurological dysfunction in schizophrenia: an investigation of lateral performance. Biol Psychiatry. 1982, 17: 381-386.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  179. Nucifora D, Calandra C: Soft neurological signs and apraxias in mood disorders and in schizophrenia. Minerva Psichiatr. 1999, 40: 147-158.

    Google Scholar 

  180. Bloch MH, Sukhodolsky DG, Dombrowski PA, Panza KE, Craiglow BG, Landeros-Weisenberger A, Leckman JF, Peterson BS, Schultz RT: Poor fine‒motor and visuospatial skills predict persistence of pediatric-onset obsessive-compulsive disorder into adulthood. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2011, 52: 974-983. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02366.x.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  181. Dar R, Kahn DT, Carmeli R: The relationship between sensory processing, childhood rituals and obsessive–compulsive symptoms. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2012, 43: 679-684. 10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.09.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  182. Rieke EF, Anderson D: Adolescent/adult sensory profile and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Am J Occup Ther. 2009, 63: 138-145. 10.5014/ajot.63.2.138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  183. Segalàs C, Labad J, Alonso P, Real E, Subirà M, Bueno B, Jiménez-Murcia S, Menchón JM: Olfactory identification and discrimination in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Depress Anxiety. 2011, 28: 932-940. 10.1002/da.20836.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  184. Peng ZW, Xu T, Miao GD, He QH, Zhao Q, Dazzan P, Chan RCK: Neurological soft signs in obsessive–compulsive disorder: the effect of co-morbid psychosis and evidence for familiality. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2012, 39: 200-205. 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2012.06.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  185. Bolton D, Gibb W, Lees A, Raven P, Gray JA, Chen E, Shafran R: Neurological soft signs in obsessive compulsive disorder: standardised assessment and comparison with schizophrenia. Behav Neurol. 1998, 11: 197-204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  186. Mataix-Cols D, Alonso P, Hernández R, Deckersbach T, Savage CR, Menchón JM, Vallejo J: Relation of neurological soft signs to nonverbal memory performance in obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2003, 25: 842-851. 10.1076/jcen.25.6.842.16470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  187. Hollander E, Schiffman E, Cohen B, Rivera-Stein MA, Rosen W, Gorman JM, Fyer AJ, Papp L, Liebowitz MR: Signs of central nervous system dysfunction in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1990, 47: 27-32. 10.1001/archpsyc.1990.01810130029005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  188. Karadag F, Tumkaya S, Kırtaş D, Efe M, Alacam H, Oguzhanoglu NK: Neurological soft signs in obsessive compulsive disorder with good and poor insight. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2011, 35: 1074-1079. 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2011.03.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  189. Gallacher J, Ilubaera V, Ben-Shlomo Y, Bayer A, Fish M, Babisch W, Elwood P: Auditory threshold, phonologic demand, and incident dementia. Neurology. 2012, 79: 1583-1590. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31826e263d.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  190. Kato-Narita EM, Nitrini R, Radanovic M: Assessment of balance in mild and moderate stages of Alzheimer’s disease: implications on falls and functional capacity [in English and Portuguese]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2011, 69 (2A): 202-207.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  191. Leandri M, Cammisuli S, Cammarata S, Baratto L, Campbell J, Simonini M, Tabaton M: Balance features in Alzheimer’s disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment. J Alzheimers Dis. 2009, 16: 113-120.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  192. Pettersson AF, Engardt M, Wahlund LO: Activity level and balance in subjects with mild Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2002, 13: 213-216. 10.1159/000057699.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  193. Pettersson AF, Olsson E, Wahlund LO: Motor function in subjects with mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2005, 19: 299-304. 10.1159/000084555.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  194. Rolland Y, Abellan van Kan G, Nourhashemi F, Andrieu S, Cantet C, Guyonnet-Gillette S, Vellas B: An abnormal “one-leg balance” test predicts cognitive decline during Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2009, 16: 525-531.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  195. Waite LM, Broe GA, Grayson DA, Creasey H: Motor function and disability in the dementias. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2000, 15: 897-903. 10.1002/1099-1166(200010)15:10<897::AID-GPS215>3.0.CO;2-C.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  196. Suttanon P, Hill KD, Said CM, LoGiudice D, Lautenschlager NT, Dodd KJ: Balance and mobility dysfunction and falls risk in older people with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012, 91: 12-23. 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31823caeea.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  197. Kluger A, Gianutsos JG, Golomb J, Ferris SH, George AE, Franssen E, Reisberg B: Patterns of motor impairment in normal aging, mild cognitive decline, and early Alzheimer’s disease. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1997, 52B: P28-P39. 10.1093/geronb/52B.1.P28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  198. Kluger A, Gianutsos JG, Golomb J, Ferris SH, Reisberg B: Motor/psychomotor dysfunction in normal aging, mild cognitive decline, and early Alzheimer’s disease: diagnostic and differential diagnostic features. Int Psychogeriatr. 1997, 9 (Suppl 1): 307-321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  199. Oakley F, Duran L, Fisher A, Merritt B: Differences in activities of daily living motor skills of persons with and without Alzheimer’s disease. Aust Occup Ther J. 2003, 50: 72-78. 10.1046/j.1440-1630.2003.00330.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  200. Ott BR, Ellias SA, Lannon MC: Quantitative assessment of movement in Alzheimer’s disease. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 1995, 8: 71-75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  201. Lam LCW, Lui VWC, Chu HFK: Association between soft neurological signs and clinical progression in Alzheimer’s disease. Hong Kong J Psychiatry. 2005, 15: 43-49.

    Google Scholar 

  202. Seidl U, Thomann PA, Schröder J: Neurological soft signs in nursing home residents with Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2009, 18: 525-532.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  203. Gagnon I, Forget R, Sullivan SJ, Friedman D: Motor performance following a mild traumatic brain injury in children: an exploratory study. Brain Inj. 1998, 12: 843-853. 10.1080/026990598122070.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  204. Galvin J, Froude EH, Imms C: Sensory processing abilities of children who have sustained traumatic brain injuries. Am J Occup Ther. 2009, 63: 701-709. 10.5014/ajot.63.6.701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  205. Katz-Leurer M, Rotem H, Lewitus H, Keren O, Meyer S: Relationship between balance abilities and gait characteristics in children with post-traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2008, 22: 153-159. 10.1080/02699050801895399.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  206. Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP, Hoppe B, Gölge M, Dreesmann M, Damm-Stünitz U, Ritz A: Sensorimotor recovery in children after traumatic brain injury: Analyses of gait, gross motor, and fine motor skills. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2003, 45: 821-828.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  207. Cole KJ: Grasp force control in older adults. J Mot Behav. 1991, 23: 251-258. 10.1080/00222895.1991.9942036.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  208. Desrosiers J, Hébert R, Bravo G, Dutil E: Hand sensibility of healthy older people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996, 44: 974-978.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  209. Fukunaga A, Uematsu H, Sugimoto K: Influences of aging on taste perception and oral somatic sensation. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005, 60A: 109-113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  210. Li SC, Huxhold O, Schmiedek F: Aging and attenuated processing robustness: evidence from cognitive and sensorimotor functioning. Gerontology. 2004, 50: 28-34. 10.1159/000074386.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  211. Petrosino L, Fucci D: Temporal resolution of the aging tactile sensory system. Percept Mot Skills. 1989, 68: 288-290. 10.2466/pms.1989.68.1.288.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  212. Pohl PS, Dunn W, Brown C: The role of sensory processing in the everyday lives of older adults. OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2003, 23: 99-106.

    Google Scholar 

  213. Ranganathan VK, Siemionow V, Sahgal V, Yue GH: Effects of aging on hand function. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001, 49: 1478-1484. 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.4911240.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  214. Schumm LP, McClintock M, Williams S, Leitsch S, Lundstrom J, Hummel T, Lindau ST: Assessment of sensory function in the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2009, 64B (Suppl 1): i76-i85.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  215. Shimokata H, Kuzuya F: Two-point discrimination test of the skin as an index of sensory aging. Gerontology. 1995, 41: 267-272. 10.1159/000213693.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  216. Stevens JC: Aging and spatial acuity of touch. J Gerontol. 1992, 47: P35-P40. 10.1093/geronj/47.1.P35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  217. Stevens JC, Cruz LA: Spatial acuity of touch: ubiquitous decline with aging revealed by repeated threshold testing. Somatosens Mot Res. 1996, 13: 1-10. 10.3109/08990229609028907.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  218. Zhang Z, Francisco EM, Holden JK, Dennis RG, Tommerdahl M: Somatosensory information processing in the aging population. Front Aging Neurosci. 2011, 3: 18-

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  219. Elsner RJF: Odor threshold, recognition, discrimination and identification in centenarians. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2001, 33: 81-94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  220. Bartoshuk LM, Rifkin B, Marks LE, Bars P: Taste and aging. J Gerontol. 1986, 41: 51-57. 10.1093/geronj/41.1.51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  221. Ashendorf L, Vanderslice-Barr JL, McCaffrey RJ: Motor tests and cognition in healthy older adults. Appl Neuropsychol. 2009, 16: 171-176. 10.1080/09084280903098562.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  222. Bennett SJ, Elliott D, Rodacki A: Movement strategies in vertical aiming of older adults. Exp Brain Res. 2012, 216: 445-455. 10.1007/s00221-011-2947-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  223. Kauranen K, Vanharanta H: Influences of aging, gender, and handedness on motor performance of upper and lower extremities. Percept Mot Skills. 1996, 82: 515-525. 10.2466/pms.1996.82.2.515.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  224. Smith CD, Umberger GH, Manning EL, Slevin JT, Wekstein DR, Schmitt FA, Markesbery WR, Zhang Z, Gerhardt GA, Kryscio RJ, Gash DM: Critical decline in fine motor hand movements in human aging. Neurology. 1999, 53: 1458-1461. 10.1212/WNL.53.7.1458.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  225. Vernazza-Martin S, Tricon V, Martin N, Mesure S, Azulay JP, Le Pellec-Muller A: Effect of aging on the coordination between equilibrium and movement: What changes?. Exp Brain Res. 2008, 187: 255-265. 10.1007/s00221-008-1301-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  226. Kleinman M: The Effects of Aging on Motor Performance (ERIC ED230488). 1982, Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse, Available at http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED230488

    Google Scholar 

  227. Santos S, Gehring PR, Bertolassi MA, De Souza Nunes ME, Basso L, Meira CM: Motor performance and aging: Is there any difference between 60 and 86 years old?. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2007, 29 (Suppl): S43-

    Google Scholar 

  228. Chan RCK, Xu T, Li HJ, Zhao Q, Liu HH, Wang Y, Yan C, Cao XY, Wang YN, Shi YF, Dazzan P: Neurological abnormalities and neurocognitive functions in healthy elder people: a structural equation modeling analysis. Behav Brain Funct. 2011, 7: 32-10.1186/1744-9081-7-32.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  229. Rogers SJ: What are infant siblings teaching us about autism in infancy?. Autism Res. 2009, 2: 125-137. 10.1002/aur.81.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  230. Hempel MS: Neurological development during toddling age in normal children and children at risk of developmental disorders. Early Hum Dev. 1993, 34: 47-57. 10.1016/0378-3782(93)90040-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  231. Bhat AN, Galloway JC, Landa RJ: Relation between early motor delay and later communication delay in infants at risk for autism. Infant Behav Dev. 2012, 35: 838-846. 10.1016/j.infbeh.2012.07.019.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  232. Bryson SE, Zwaigenbaum L, Brian J, Roberts W, Szatmari P, Rombough V, McDermott C: A prospective case series of high-risk infants who developed autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2007, 37: 12-24. 10.1007/s10803-006-0328-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  233. Mulligan S, White BP: Sensory and motor behaviors of infant siblings of children with and without autism. Am J Occup Ther. 2012, 66: 556-566. 10.5014/ajot.2012.004077.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  234. Landa RJ, Gross AL, Stuart EA, Bauman M: Latent class analysis of early developmental trajectory in baby siblings of children with autism. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012, 53: 986-996. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02558.x.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  235. Landa R, Garrett-Mayer E: Development in infants with autism spectrum disorders: a prospective study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006, 47: 629-638. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01531.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  236. Landa RJ, Gross AL, Stuart EA, Faherty A: Developmental trajectories in children with and without autism spectrum disorders: the first 3 years. Child Dev. 2013, 84: 429-442. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01870.x.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  237. Kroes M, Kessels AGH, Kalff AC, Feron FJM, Vissers YLJ, Jolles J, Vles JSH: Quality of movement as predictor of ADHD: results from a prospective population study in 5- and 6-year-old children. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002, 44: 753-760.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  238. Viholainen H, Ahonen T, Lyytinen P, Cantell M, Tolvanen A, Lyytinen H: Early motor development and later language and reading skills in children at risk of familial dyslexia. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006, 48: 367-373. 10.1017/S001216220600079X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  239. Viholainen H, Ahonen T, Cantell M, Lyytinen P, Lyytinen H: Development of early motor skills and language in children at risk for familial dyslexia. Dev Medicine Child Neurol. 2002, 44: 761-769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  240. Cannon M, Jones P, Huttunen MO, Tanskanen A, Murray RM: Motor co-ordination deficits as predictors of schizophrenia among Finnish school children. Hum Psychopharmacol. 1999, 14: 491-497. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1077(199910)14:7<491::AID-HUP134>3.0.CO;2-V.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  241. Murray GK, Jones PB, Moilanen K, Veijola J, Miettunen J, Cannon TD, Isohanni M: Infant motor development and adult cognitive functions in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2006, 81: 65-74. 10.1016/j.schres.2005.08.016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  242. Schiffman J, Sorensen HJ, Maeda J, Mortensen EL, Victoroff J, Hayashi K, Michelsen NM, Ekstrom M, Mednick S: Childhood motor coordination and adult schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2009, 166: 1041-1047. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.08091400.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  243. Walker E, Lewine RJ: Prediction of adult-onset schizophrenia from childhood home movies of the patients. Am J Psychiatry. 1990, 147: 1052-1056.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  244. Rosso IM, Bearden CE, Hollister JM, Gasperoni TL, Sanchez LE, Hadley T, Cannon TD: Childhood neuromotor dysfunction in schizophrenia patients and their unaffected siblings: a prospective cohort study. Schizophr Bull. 2000, 26: 367-378. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033459.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  245. Watkins JM, Asarnow RF, Tanguay PE: Symptom development in childhood onset schizophrenia. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1988, 29: 865-878. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1988.tb00759.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  246. Clarke MC, Tanskanen A, Huttunen M, Leon DA, Murray RM, Jones PB, Cannon M: Increased risk of schizophrenia from additive interaction between infant motor developmental delay and obstetric complications: evidence from a population-based longitudinal study. Am J Psychiatry. 2011, 168: 1295-1302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  247. Fish B, Dixon WJ: Vestibular hyporeactivity in infants at risk for schizophrenia: association with critical developmental disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1978, 35: 963-971. 10.1001/archpsyc.1978.01770320057004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  248. Walker E, Lewis N, Loewy R, Palyo S: Motor dysfunction and risk for schizophrenia. Dev Psychopathol. 1999, 11: 509-523. 10.1017/S0954579499002187.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  249. Gschwandtner U, Pflüger M, Aston J, Borgwardt S, Drewe M, Stieglitz RD, Riecher-Rössler A: Fine motor function and neuropsychological deficits in individuals at risk for schizophrenia. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2006, 256: 201-206. 10.1007/s00406-005-0626-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  250. Koning JP, Tenback DE, Kahn RS, Vollema MG, Cahn W, van Harten PN: Movement disorders are associated with schizotypy in unaffected siblings of patients with non-affective psychosis. Psychol Med. 2011, 41: 2141-2147. 10.1017/S0033291711000389.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  251. Mittal VA, Dhruv S, Tessner KD, Walder DJ, Walker EF: The relations among putative biorisk markers in schizotypal adolescents: minor physical anomalies, movement abnormalities, and salivary cortisol. Biol Psychiatry. 2007, 61: 1179-1186. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.08.043.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  252. Mittal VA, Neumann C, Saczawa M, Walker EF: Longitudinal progression of movement abnormalities in relation to psychotic symptoms in adolescents at high risk of schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008, 65: 165-171. 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2007.23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  253. Neumann CS, Walker EF: Neuromotor functioning in adolescents with schizotypal personality disorder: associations with symptoms and neurocognition. Schizophr Bull. 2003, 29: 285-298. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  254. Blanchard MM, Jacobson S, Clarke MC, Connor D, Kelleher I, Garavan H, Harley M, Cannon M: Language, motor and speed of processing deficits in adolescents with subclinical psychotic symptoms. Schizophr Res. 2010, 123: 71-76. 10.1016/j.schres.2010.05.028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  255. Chan RCK, Wang Y, Zhao Q, Yan C, Xu T, Gong Q, Manschreck TC: Neurological soft signs in individuals with schizotypal personality features. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2010, 44: 800-804.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  256. Chang BP, Lenzenweger MF: Somatosensory processing in the biological relatives of schizophrenia patients: a signal detection analysis of two-point discrimination. J Abnorm Psychol. 2001, 110: 433-442.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  257. Chang BP, Lenzenweger MF: Somatosensory processing and schizophrenia liability: proprioception, exteroceptive sensitivity, and graphesthesia performance in the biological relatives of schizophrenia patients. J Abnorm Psychol. 2005, 114: 85-95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  258. Marcus J, Hans SL, Auerbach JG, Auerbach AG: Children at risk for schizophrenia: the Jerusalem Infant Development Study. II. Neurobehavioral deficits at school age. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993, 50: 797-809. 10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820220053006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  259. Rieder RO, Nichols PL: Offspring of schizophrenics. III. Hyperactivity and neurological soft signs. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1979, 36: 665-674. 10.1001/archpsyc.1979.01780060055006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  260. Fish B: An approach to prevention in infants at risk for schizophrenia: developmental deviations from birth to 10 years. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry. 1976, 15: 62-82. 10.1016/S0002-7138(09)62261-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  261. Fish B, Hagin R: Visual-motor disorders in infants at risk for schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1973, 28: 900-904. 10.1001/archpsyc.1973.01750360110017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  262. Egan MF, Hyde TM, Bonomo JB, Mattay VS, Bigelow LB, Goldberg TE, Weinberger DR: Relative risk of neurological signs in siblings of patients with schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2001, 158: 1827-1834. 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.11.1827.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  263. Mechri A, Gassab L, Slama H, Gaha L, Saoud M, Krebs MO: Neurological soft signs and schizotypal dimensions in unaffected siblings of patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 2010, 175: 22-26. 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.10.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  264. Picchioni MM, Toulopoulou T, Landau S, Davies N, Ribchester T, Murray RM: Neurological abnormalities in schizophrenic twins. Biol Psychiatry. 2006, 59: 341-348. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.07.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  265. Prasad KM, Sanders R, Sweeney J, Montrose D, Diwadkar V, Dworakowski D, Miewald J, Keshavan M: Neurological abnormalities among offspring of persons with schizophrenia: relation to premorbid psychopathology. Schizophr Res. 2009, 108 (1): 163-169.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  266. Harjan A: Children of parents with affective disorders: developmental and behavior disorders, somatic and psychiatric care. Eur J Psychiatry. 1989, 3: 219-234.

    Google Scholar 

  267. Pine D, Shaffer D, Schonfeld IS: Persistent emotional disorder in children with neurological soft signs. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1993, 32: 1229-1236. 10.1097/00004583-199311000-00017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  268. Shaffer D, Schonfeld I, O’Connor PA, Stokman C, Trautman P, Shafer S, Ng S: Neurological soft signs: their relationship to psychiatric disorder and intelligence in childhood and adolescence. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985, 42: 342-351. 10.1001/archpsyc.1985.01790270028003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  269. Turner SM, Beidel DC, Roberson-Nay R: Offspring of anxious parents: reactivity, habituation, and anxiety-proneness. Behav Res Ther. 2005, 43: 1263-1279. 10.1016/j.brat.2004.09.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  270. Sigurdsson E, van Os J, Fombonne E: Are impaired childhood motor skills a risk factor for adolescent anxiety? Results from the 1958 U.K. birth cohort and the National Child Development Study. Am J Psychiatry. 2002, 159: 1044-1046. 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.6.1044.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  271. Sigurdsson E, Fombonne E, Sayal K, Checkley S: Neurodevelopmental antecedents of early-onset bipolar affective disorder. Br J Psychiatry. 1999, 174: 121-127. 10.1192/bjp.174.2.121.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  272. Grisham JR, Fullana MA, Mataix-Cols D, Moffitt TE, Caspi A, Poulton R: Risk factors prospectively associated with adult obsessive–compulsive symptom dimensions and obsessive–compulsive disorder. Psychol Med. 2011, 41: 2495-2506. 10.1017/S0033291711000894.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  273. Inzitari M, Carlo A, Baldereschi M, Pracucci G, Maggi S, Gandolfo C, Bonaiuto S, Farchi G, Scafato E, Carbonin P, Inzitari D: ILSA Working Group: Risk and predictors of motor-performance decline in a normally functioning population-based sample of elderly subjects: the Italian Longitudinal Study on Aging. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006, 54: 318-324. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00584.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  274. Aggarwal NT, Wilson RS, Beck TL, Bienias JL, Bennett DA: Motor dysfunction in mild cognitive impairment and the risk of incident Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2006, 63: 1763-1769. 10.1001/archneur.63.12.1763.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  275. Scarmeas N, Albert M, Brandt J, Blacker D, Hadjigeorgiou G, Papadimitriou A, Dubois B, Sarazin M, Wegesin D, Marder K, Bell K, Honig L, Stern Y: Motor signs predict poor outcomes in Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2005, 64: 1696-1703. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000162054.15428.E9.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  276. Mittal VA, Tessner KD, Trottman HD, Esterberg M, Dhrub SH, Simeonova DI, McMillan AL, Murphy E, Saczawa ME, Walker EF: Movement abnormalities and the progression of prodromal symptomatology in adolescents at risk for psychotic disorders. J Abnorm Psychol. 2007, 116: 260-267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  277. Kremen WS, Koenen KC, Afari N, Lyons MJ: Twin studies of posttraumatic stress disorder: differentiating vulnerability factors from sequelae. Neuropharmacology. 2012, 62: 647-653. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.03.012.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  278. Kinnealey M, Fuiek M: The relationship between sensory defensiveness, anxiety, depression and perception of pain in adults. Occup Ther Int. 1999, 6: 195-206. 10.1002/oti.97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  279. Liss M, Timmel L, Baxley K, Killingsworth P: Sensory processing sensitivity and its relation to parental bonding, anxiety, and depression. Pers Individ Dif. 2005, 39: 1429-1439. 10.1016/j.paid.2005.05.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  280. Goldsmith HH, Van Hulle CA, Arneson CL, Schreiber JE, Gernsbacher MA: A population-based twin study of parentally reported tactile and auditory defensiveness in young children. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2006, 34: 378-392. 10.1007/s10802-006-9024-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  281. Engel-Yeger B, Dunn W: The relationship between sensory processing difficulties and anxiety level of healthy adults. Br J Occup Ther. 2011, 74: 210-216. 10.4276/030802211X13046730116407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  282. Piek JP, Barrett NC, Smith LM, Rigoli D, Gasson N: Do motor skills in infancy and early childhood predict anxious and depressive symptomatology at school age?. Hum Mov Sci. 2010, 29: 777-786. 10.1016/j.humov.2010.03.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  283. Pearsall-Jones JG, Piek JP, Rigoli D, Martin NC, Levy F: Motor disorder and anxious and depressive symptomatology: a monozygotic co-twin control approach. Res Dev Disabil. 2011, 32: 1245-1252. 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.01.042.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  284. Bart O, Bar-Haim Y, Weizman E, Levin M, Sadeh A, Mintz M: Balance treatment ameliorates anxiety and increases self-esteem in children with comorbid anxiety and balance disorder. Res Dev Disabil. 2009, 30: 486-495. 10.1016/j.ridd.2008.07.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  285. Kogan E, Lidor R, Bart O, Bar-Haim Y, Mintz M: Comorbidity between balance and anxiety disorders: verification in a normal population. J Psychol. 2008, 142: 601-613. 10.3200/JRLP.142.6.601-614.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  286. Lane SJ, Reynolds S, Thacker L: Sensory over-responsivity and ADHD: differentiating using electrodermal responses, cortisol, and anxiety. Front Integr Neurosci. 2010, 4: 8-

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  287. Liss M, Mailloux J, Erchull MJ: The relationships between sensory processing sensitivity, alexithymia, autism, depression, and anxiety. Pers Individ Dif. 2008, 45: 255-259. 10.1016/j.paid.2008.04.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  288. Piek JP, Bradbury GS, Elsley SC, Tate L: Motor coordination and social-emotional behaviour in preschool-aged children. Int J Disabil Dev Educ. 2008, 55: 143-151. 10.1080/10349120802033592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  289. Robertson AE, Simmons DR: The relationship between sensory sensitivity and autistic traits in the general population. J Autism Dev Disord. 2013, 43: 775-784. 10.1007/s10803-012-1608-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  290. Neal JA, Edelmann RJ, Glachan M: Behavioural inhibition and symptoms of anxiety and depression: Is there a specific relationship with social phobia?. Br J Clin Psychol. 2002, 41: 361-374. 10.1348/014466502760387489.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  291. Meyer B, Carver CS: Negative childhood accounts, sensitivity, and pessimism: a study of avoidant personality disorder features in college students. J Pers Disord. 2000, 14: 233-248. 10.1521/pedi.2000.14.3.233.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  292. Meyer B, Ajchenbrenner M, Bowles DP: Sensory sensitivity, attachment experiences, and rejection responses among adults with borderline and avoidant features. J Pers Disord. 2005, 19: 641-658. 10.1521/pedi.2005.19.6.641.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  293. Ben-Sasson A, Carter AS, Briggs-Gowan MJ: Sensory over-responsivity in elementary school: prevalence and social-emotional correlates. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2009, 37: 705-716. 10.1007/s10802-008-9295-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  294. Gouze KR, Hopkins J, LeBailly SA, Lavigne JV: Re-examining the epidemiology of sensory regulation dysfunction and comorbid psychopathology. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2009, 37: 1077-1087. 10.1007/s10802-009-9333-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  295. Stansfeld SA, Clark CR, Jenkins LM, Tarnopolsky A: Sensitivity to noise in a community sample: I. Measurement of psychiatric disorder and personality. Psychol Med. 1985, 15: 243-254. 10.1017/S0033291700023527.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  296. Balaban CD: Neural substrates linking balance control and anxiety. Physiol Behav. 2002, 77: 469-475. 10.1016/S0031-9384(02)00935-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  297. Stam CJ, van Straaten ECW: The organization of physiological brain networks. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012, 123: 1067-1087. 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.01.011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  298. Bullmore E, Sporns O: The economy of brain network organization. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012, 13: 336-349.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  299. van den Heuvel MP, Sporns O: Rich-club organization of the human connectome. J Neurosci. 2011, 31: 15775-15786. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3539-11.2011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  300. Ahmadlou M, Rostami R, Sadeghi V: Which attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder children will be improved through neurofeedback therapy? A graph theoretical approach to neocortex neuronal network of ADHD. Neurosci Lett. 2012, 516: 156-160. 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.03.087.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  301. Kitano H: Biological robustness. Nat Rev Genet. 2004, 5: 826-837. 10.1038/nrg1471.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  302. Sporns O: Networks of the Brain. 2011, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  303. Achard S, Salvador R, Whitcher B, Suckling J, Bullmore E: A resilient, low-frequency, small-world human brain functional network with highly connected association cortical hubs. J Neurosci. 2006, 26: 63-72. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3874-05.2006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  304. Bassett DS, Bullmore E: Small-world brain networks. Neuroscientist. 2006, 12: 512-523. 10.1177/1073858406293182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  305. Maffei A, Fontanini A: Network homeostasis: a matter of coordination. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2009, 19: 168-173. 10.1016/j.conb.2009.05.012.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  306. Binzegger T, Douglas RJ, Martin KA: Topology and dynamics of the canonical circuit of cat V1. Neural Netw. 2009, 22: 1071-1078. 10.1016/j.neunet.2009.07.011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  307. Dosenbach NU, Fair DA, Cohen AL, Schlaggar BL, Petersen SE: A dual-networks architecture of top-down control. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008, 12: 99-105. 10.1016/j.tics.2008.01.001.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  308. Griffa A, Baumann PS, Thiran JP, Hagmann P: Structural connectomics in brain diseases. Neuroimage. 2013, 80: 515-526.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  309. Liu Y, Liang M, Zhou Y, He Y, Hao Y, Song M, Yu C, Liu H, Liu Z, Jiang T: Disrupted small-world networks in schizophrenia. Brain. 2008, 131: 945-961. 10.1093/brain/awn018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  310. Uhlhaas PJ, Singer W: The development of neural synchrony and large-scale cortical networks during adolescence: relevance for the pathophysiology of schizophrenia and neurodevelopmental hypothesis. Schizophr Bull. 2011, 37: 514-523. 10.1093/schbul/sbr034.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  311. Rippon G, Brock J, Brown C, Boucher J: Disordered connectivity in the autistic brain: challenges for the ‘new psychophysiology’. Int J Psychophysiol. 2007, 63: 164-172. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.03.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  312. Pettersson-Yeo W, Allen P, Benetti S, McGuire P, Mechelli A: Dysconnectivity in schizophrenia: Where are we now?. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011, 35: 1110-1124. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.11.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  313. Boersma M, Kemner C, de Reus MA, Collin G, Snijders TM, Hofman D, Buitelaar JK, Stam CJ, van den Heuvel MP: Disrupted functional brain networks in autistic toddlers. Brain Connect. 2013, 3: 41-49. 10.1089/brain.2012.0127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  314. Peters JM, Taquet M, Vega C, Jeste SS, Fernandez IS, Tan J, Nelson CA, Nelson CA, Sahin M, Warfield SK: Brain functional networks in syndromic and non-syndromic autism: a graph theoretical study of EEG connectivity. BMC Med. 2013, 11: 54-10.1186/1741-7015-11-54.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  315. Barttfeld P, Wicker B, Cukier S, Navarta S, Lew S, Sigman M: A big-world network in ASD: dynamical connectivity analysis reflects a deficit in long-range connections and an excess of short-range connections. Neuropsychologia. 2011, 49: 254-263. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  316. Pollonini L, Patidar U, Situ N, Rezaie R, Papanicolaou AC, Zouridakis G: Functional connectivity networks in the autistic and healthy brain assessed using Granger causality. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE. 2010, IEEE, 1730-1733.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  317. Wang L, Zhu C, He Y, Zang Y, Cao Q, Zhang H, Zhong Q, Wang Y: Altered small-world brain functional networks in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009, 30: 638-649. 10.1002/hbm.20530.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  318. Ahmadlou M, Adeli H, Adeli A: Graph theoretical analysis of organization of functional brain networks in ADHD. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2012, 43: 5-13. 10.1177/1550059411428555.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  319. Yu D: Additional brain functional network in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a phase synchrony analysis. PLoS One. 2013, 8: e54516-10.1371/journal.pone.0054516.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  320. van den Heuvel MP, Mandl RC, Stam CJ, Kahn RS, Hulshoff Pol H: Aberrant frontal and temporal complex network structure in schizophrenia: a graph theoretical analysis. J Neurosci. 2010, 30: 15915-15926. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2874-10.2010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  321. Wang Q, Su TP, Zhou Y, Chou KH, Chen IY, Jiang T, Lin CP: Anatomical insights into disrupted small-world networks in schizophrenia. Neuroimage. 2012, 59: 1085-1093. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  322. Yu Q, Sui J, Rachakonda S, He H, Gruner W, Pearlson G, Kiehl KA, Calhoun VD: Altered topological properties of functional network connectivity in schizophrenia during resting state: a small-world brain network study. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e25423-10.1371/journal.pone.0025423.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  323. Bassett DS, Bullmore E, Verchinski BA, Mattay VS, Weinberger DR, Meyer-Lindenberg A: Hierarchical organization of human cortical networks in health and schizophrenia. J Neurosci. 2008, 28: 9239-9248. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1929-08.2008.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  324. Zhang J, Wang J, Wu Q, Kuang W, Huang X, He Y, Gong Q: Disrupted brain connectivity networks in drug-naive, first-episode major depressive disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2011, 70: 334-342. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.05.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  325. Zhang T, Wang J, Yang Y, Wu Q, Li B, Chen L, Yue Q, Tang H, Yan C, Lui S, Huang X, Chan RC, Zang Y, He Y, Gong Q: Abnormal small-world architecture of top-down control networks in obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2011, 36: 23-31. 10.1503/jpn.100006.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  326. Stam CJ, Jones BF, Nolte G, Breakspear M, Scheltens P: Small-world networks and functional connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease. Cereb Cortex. 2007, 17: 92-99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  327. Supekar K, Menon V, Rubin D, Musen M, Greicius MD: Network analysis of intrinsic functional brain connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS Comput Biol. 2008, 4: e1000100-10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000100.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  328. Stam CJ, de Haan W, Daffertshofer A, Jones BF, Manshanden I, van Cappellen van Walsum AM, Montez T, Verbunt JPA, de Munck JC, van Dijk BW, Berendse HW, Scheltens P: Graph theoretical analysis of magnetoencephalographic functional connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain. 2009, 132: 213-224.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  329. Sanz-Arigita EJ, Schoonheim MM, Damoiseaux JS, Rombouts SARB, Maris E, Barkhof F, Scheltens P, Stam CJ: Loss of ‘small-world’ networks in Alzheimer’s disease: graph analysis of fMRI resting-state functional connectivity. PLoS One. 2010, 5: e13788-10.1371/journal.pone.0013788.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  330. Pievani M, de Haan W, Wu T, Seeley WW, Frisoni GB: Functional network disruption in the degenerative dementias. Lancet Neurol. 2011, 10: 829-843. 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70158-2.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  331. Pandit AS, Expert P, Lambiotte R, Bonnelle V, Leech R, Turkheimer FE, Sharp DJ: Traumatic brain injury impairs small-world topology. Neurology. 2013, 80: 1826-1833. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182929f38.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  332. Montembeault M, Joubert S, Doyon J, Carrier J, Gagnon JF, Monchi O, Lungu O, Belleville S, Brambati SM: The impact of aging on gray matter structural covariance networks. Neuroimage. 2012, 63: 754-759. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.052.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  333. Ferreira LK, Busatto GF: Resting-state functional connectivity in normal brain aging. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013, 37: 384-400. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.01.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  334. Yao Z, Zhang Y, Lin L, Zhou Y, Xu C, Jiang T: Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: Abnormal cortical networks in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. PLoS Comput Biol. 2010, 6: e1001006-10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001006.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  335. Belmonte MK, Gomot M, Baron-Cohen S: Visual attention in autism families: ‘unaffected’ sibs share atypical frontal activation. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2010, 51: 259-276. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02153.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  336. Gogtay N, Vyas NS, Testa R, Wood SJ, Pantelis C: Age of onset of schizophrenia: perspectives from structural neuroimaging studies. Schizophr Bull. 2011, 37: 504-513. 10.1093/schbul/sbr030.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  337. Fornito A, Bullmore ET: Connectomic intermediate phenotypes for psychiatric disorders. Front Psychiatry. 2012, 3: 32-

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  338. Buldú JM, Bajo R, Maestú F, Castellanos N, Leyva I, Gil P, Sendiña-Nadal I, Almendral JA, Nevado A, del-Pozo F, Boccaletti S: Reorganization of functional networks in mild cognitive impairment. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e19584-10.1371/journal.pone.0019584.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  339. Pijnenburg YAL, van der Made Y, van Cappellen van Walsum AM, Knol DL, Scheltens P, Stam CJ: EEG synchronization likelihood in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease during a working memory task. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004, 115: 1332-1339. 10.1016/j.clinph.2003.12.029.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  340. Wang J, Zuo X, Dai Z, Xia M, Zhao Z, Zhao X, Jia J, Han Y, He Y: Disrupted functional brain connectome in individuals at risk for Alzheimer’s disease. Biol Psychiatry. 2013, 73: 472-481. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.03.026.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  341. Nir T, Jahanshad N, Jack CR, Weiner MW, Toga AW, Thompson PM, the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI): Small world network measures predict white matter degeneration in patients with early-stage mild cognitive impairment. Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging. 2012, 2012: 1405-1408.